2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient fault-tolerant group key agreement protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table I, we can see that the computational cost of IGKA protocol is the same with the protocol of Zhao et al [16], which is more efficient than other previous fault-tolerant group key agreement protocols.…”
Section: Computational Cost Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From Table I, we can see that the computational cost of IGKA protocol is the same with the protocol of Zhao et al [16], which is more efficient than other previous fault-tolerant group key agreement protocols.…”
Section: Computational Cost Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In this section, we will compare our improved group key agreement (IGKA) protocol with Tzeng's protocol [12], Tseng's protocol [13], protocol of Huang et al [14], and the protocol of Zhao et al [16] in computational cost and communication cost. The reason why we chose these protocols for comparison is that they are fault-tolerant and PKI-based.…”
Section: Efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2009, Huang et al [6] proposed an enhanced group key agreement protocol based on Discrete Logarithm Problem (DLP) and they claimed that their protocol is more efficient in terms of computation and communication. In 2010, Zhao et al [7] proposed a group key agreement protocol based on RSA cryptosystem [8] to improve the performance of Huang et al's protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%