2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient fault tolerant workflow scheduling approach using replication heuristics and checkpointing in the cloud

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HEFT series approaches tend to select the first available server to enable the earliest finish time. Although HEFT series approaches were developed over a long time period, selecting the first available server might not be the optimal configuration when handling faults [15,21,24]. It may cause anabatic deadline or resource competition problems in which the job rescue with the high priority may unnecessarily impact the job rescue with the low priority.…”
Section: Related Work and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HEFT series approaches tend to select the first available server to enable the earliest finish time. Although HEFT series approaches were developed over a long time period, selecting the first available server might not be the optimal configuration when handling faults [15,21,24]. It may cause anabatic deadline or resource competition problems in which the job rescue with the high priority may unnecessarily impact the job rescue with the low priority.…”
Section: Related Work and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HEFT series approaches are one of the most significant series of job scheduling strategies published from 2002 to date [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Although HEFT series approaches were proposed over past decade, selecting the first available server to enable job to finish early might not be the optimal solution when handling faults [15,21,24]. It may cause unnecessary deadline or resource competition between the job with high priority and the job with low priority.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [19] combine the resubmission and replication with meeting the soft time limit of the workflow. Setlur et al [20] study the scheduling 2…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey in [6] classifies the fault tolerance architecture into proactive and reactive architecture. The fault tolerance techniques are applied in different stages of cloud computing, such as in scheduling [14], [15], [16], [17], resource allocation [18], [19], to improve the reliability [20], placement of virtual network function in cloud network [21] etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%