2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient frequency domain analysis method for bridge structure-borne noise prediction under train load and its application in noise reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acoustic board and steel spring floating plate 58 1-5 dB Track acoustic absorber, track side noise barrier 59 1-5 dB…”
Section: Elevated Trainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic board and steel spring floating plate 58 1-5 dB Track acoustic absorber, track side noise barrier 59 1-5 dB…”
Section: Elevated Trainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [13] tested the structural noise on the box girder and U-shaped girder sections of the Shanghai rail transit line, finding that the A-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) in the U-shaped girder section was 2.5 dB lower than that in the box girder section. Liu et al [14] conducted vibration and noise tests on a 30 m U-shaped girder bridge equipped with vibration-damping fasteners and found that the fasteners can effectively reduce the vibration but have little effect on acoustic control. Zbiciak et.al [15,16] carried out tests under slab mats to reduce under-rail vibrations; they found that slab mats can effectively reduce vibrations in the frequency range above 34 Hz, and the insertion loss for the 30 mm thickness of under slab mats is up to 75%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The finite element boundary element (FE-BEM) model of a U-shaped concrete subway girder was established, and the structural vibration and noise of the bridge was predicted by using the frequency domain method. 29 For high-frequency vibration and noise simulation, statistical energy analysis (SEA) method can be more efficient than FEM and BEM, especially for structures with high modal densities, 30 such as steel bridges, with the maximum frequency of interest of over 1000 Hz. More and more hybrid methods are applied to predict wide band range noise radiation of composite bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%