Environmental movements of the late 20th century resulted in sweeping
legislation and regulatory actions to reduce the prevalence of diverse
pollutants. Although the consequences of noise pollution to public
health, the environment, and the economy have been recognized over the
same time period, noise has received far less policy attention.
Correspondingly, even while recent decades have seen robust advancements
in assessing the impacts of noise pollution, solutions and actual
reductions in environmental noise have remained seemingly out of reach.
To address this shortcoming, we developed a prospectus for environmental
noise reduction through technology-forcing policies. Technology-forcing
describes intent to encourage technological solutions for pollution
control through policy and regulations, and has been a critical
component of national and global progress in reducing environmental
pollutants. We take advantage of the unique policy history for noise in
the United States - which initially enacted, but then abandoned federal
noise regulation. We compare this history against outcomes from
contemporaneous environmental legislation for air, water, and
occupational pollution control, to demonstrate the potential for
technology-forcing to reduce noise pollution. Our review then identifies
promising solutions, in the form of existing technologies suitable for
innovation and diffusion through technology-forcing regulations and
incentives. Based on this review, we outline a program for noise policy
development that is intended to support efforts to reduce environmental
noise pollution worldwide. The proposed program consists of three steps,
2 which are to (i) identify dominant sources of noise pollution, (ii)
combine legislative or regulatory provisions with suitable systems of
enforcement and incentives, and (iii) anticipate and prepare for stages
of technological change. This work is intended to support and advocate
for noise policies designed around technology-forcing, to advance
technologies that not only improve public health and sustainable
development, but ensure that these benefits are distributed equitably.