2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and I 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cybermatics_2018.2018.00072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Greedy Algorithm for Wide Band Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of CS based on the proposed sensing matrix is measured by computing the absolute error and MSE (mean square error). The absolute error is defined by Nasar et al 33 All the following results of the proposed matrix are based on x (0) = 0.5, a = 4.1, and r = 12 of CQAC map. 0.75emAbserrgoodbreak=i=1K0.1emrecovered signaloriginal signal0.5emLength of original signal The MSE is defined by 21 italicMSEgoodbreak=1NN0.1emoriginal signalrecovered signal2 To evaluate the performance of the CS based on CQAC sensing matrix, we compare it with Gaussian matrix and chaotic sensing matrices based on logistic and quadratic maps in reference 13 and chaotic matrix based on Chebyshev map in reference, 20 which is based on the modified chaotic map by Equations and , respectively: vmgoodbreak=1goodbreak−2x1000+italicmd vmgoodbreak=C1000+italicmd where m = 0, 1, 2 …, d is the down sampling factor, x is the sequence created from logistic and quadratic maps, and C is the sequence created from Chebyshev map.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of CS based on the proposed sensing matrix is measured by computing the absolute error and MSE (mean square error). The absolute error is defined by Nasar et al 33 All the following results of the proposed matrix are based on x (0) = 0.5, a = 4.1, and r = 12 of CQAC map. 0.75emAbserrgoodbreak=i=1K0.1emrecovered signaloriginal signal0.5emLength of original signal The MSE is defined by 21 italicMSEgoodbreak=1NN0.1emoriginal signalrecovered signal2 To evaluate the performance of the CS based on CQAC sensing matrix, we compare it with Gaussian matrix and chaotic sensing matrices based on logistic and quadratic maps in reference 13 and chaotic matrix based on Chebyshev map in reference, 20 which is based on the modified chaotic map by Equations and , respectively: vmgoodbreak=1goodbreak−2x1000+italicmd vmgoodbreak=C1000+italicmd where m = 0, 1, 2 …, d is the down sampling factor, x is the sequence created from logistic and quadratic maps, and C is the sequence created from Chebyshev map.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most compressive wideband sensing approaches need spectrum recovery, either signal recovery [1][2][3] or power spectrum recovery [4,[7][8]. However, the above approaches that use highly non-linear reconstruction methods for spectrum recovery are computationally expensive.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, CS-based wideband spectrum sensing method has become a research hotspot. The most classical methods fall into two broad categories: nonconvex optimization-based [2] and greedy pursuit-based [3]. However, CS-based wideband spectrum sensing requires that the wideband spectrum satisfies sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because compressed sensing (CS) was first applied to wideband spectrum sensing (WSS) [1], sub-Nyquist sampling-based WSS methods have received a lot of attention from experts, and the development momentum has been unstoppable. Some fairly classical CS-based methods, such as those non-convex optimization-based [2] and greedy pursuit-based [3], although they are good solutions to the problem of high Nyquist sampling rate for WSS, they require signal recovery, which brings a large computational burden. To overcome the disadvantage of high computational complexity of the CS-based method, some later works propose reconstructing the power spectrum [4] or covariance matrix [5] of the wideband signal from sub-Nyquist samples obtained by the multichannel sampling scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we choose two additional algorithms for comparison. One is the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm [3], a representative of CS-based methods, and the other is the NoR algorithm. Experimental simulations and computational complexity analysis prove that when the spectrum is not sparse, the AdNoR not only has much better detection performance than the other three algorithms but also has a low computational complexity comparable to that of the NoR and ADP algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%