2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-010-0517-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient high payload ±1 data embedding scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance comparison has been made among the proposed LSB Flipping, LSB matching, LSB-MR method [1] , Omoomi's method [2] and EMD method [5] as shown in Fig.1(a). The LSB-MR method incurs less changes in the images compared to a plain LSB matching technique, therefore has improved security against the HCF-COM analysis introduced in [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance comparison has been made among the proposed LSB Flipping, LSB matching, LSB-MR method [1] , Omoomi's method [2] and EMD method [5] as shown in Fig.1(a). The LSB-MR method incurs less changes in the images compared to a plain LSB matching technique, therefore has improved security against the HCF-COM analysis introduced in [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mielikainen [1] proposed a method, called LSB matching revisited (LSB-MR), which has been shown that embedding efficiency is significantly larger than the early LSB-based algorithms. In [2], another type of steganographic method for improving embedding performance is presented. It allows embedding the same payload as LSB-MR algorithm but with fewer modifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms based on spatial domain may operate directly on the image pixel intensity [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The algorithms using transform domain operate mainly in DCT, DWT, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is with fewer revisions to the pixels of the cover image than LSB-M when embedding the same capacity messages. The embedding rate is 0.5 bit per pixel (bpp) in LSB-MR. Omoomi et al proposed a novel efficient high payload ±1 steganographic scheme based on a special two variable binary functions [5]. Embedding capacity is 1.00 bit per pixel (bpp) in the EPES method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%