2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm to design finite impulse response filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the method, it is pre-requisite to get the impulse response from the desired frequency response, and then the impulse response is multiplied by a window function. The method is efficient and fast, but the truncation of the impulse response results in large ripples in pass band and stop band 6,7 in the frequency domain. Another popular method for FIR digital filter design is the frequency sampling method.…”
Section: Traditional Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the method, it is pre-requisite to get the impulse response from the desired frequency response, and then the impulse response is multiplied by a window function. The method is efficient and fast, but the truncation of the impulse response results in large ripples in pass band and stop band 6,7 in the frequency domain. Another popular method for FIR digital filter design is the frequency sampling method.…”
Section: Traditional Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further optimize the solution, some researchers recently proposed improved or new methods. Hybrid genetic algorithm (HGA) 7 introduces a self-adaptive management of the balance between diversity and elitism during the genetic life. Only some promising reference chromosomes are submitted to a local optimization procedure.…”
Section: Evolutionary Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evolutionary algorithms, because of their ability in converging to the global optima, have been widely used for FIR filter design (Ababneh and Bataineh, 2008;Ahmad and Antoniou, 2006;Boudjelaba et al, 2014;Ghoshal et al, 2012;Karaboga and Cetinkaya, 2006;Liu et al, 2010;Lu and Tzeng, 2000;Mandal et al, 2012;Najjarzadeh and Ayatollahi, 2008;Radecki et al, 2005;Saha et al, 2013aSaha et al, , 2013c. The various techniques reported in this context include simulated annealing (Radecki et al, 2005), genetic algorithms (GA) (Ahmad and Antoniou, 2006;Boudjelaba et al, 2014;Lu and Tzeng, 2000), particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Ababneh and Bataineh, 2008;Mandal et al, 2012), Differential evolution (DE) (Karaboga and Cetinkaya, 2006;Liu et al, 2010), Hybrid differential evolution and PSO (DEPSO) (Luitel and Venayagamoorthy, 2008), orthogonal harmony search algorithm (OHS) (Saha et al, 2013a), Cat swarm optimization (CSO) (Saha et al, 2013b), bacteria foraging optimization algorithm (Saha et al, 2013c) and Seeker optimization algorithm (SOA) . However, a common limitation with most of the optimization based FIR filter design techniques is that they aim at meeting a specific objective i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…particle swarm method followed by a global minimization method (Vaz & Vicente, 2007, tabu search and simulated annealing algorithms as presented in Hedar et al (2002), Hedar and Fukushima (2006), or genetic algorithms (Boudjelaba, Ros, & Chikouche, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%