2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient implementation of 3D high-resolution imaging for large-scale seismic data with GPU/CPU heterogeneous parallel computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it takes 115 and 2218 s to calculate the simple 2D profile in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Even when using GPUs, several months may be required to obtain the high-resolution results for a real 3D field dataset [3]. This prevents the application of this approach to large-scale problems.…”
Section: High-resolution Imaging Using Qpstmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it takes 115 and 2218 s to calculate the simple 2D profile in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Even when using GPUs, several months may be required to obtain the high-resolution results for a real 3D field dataset [3]. This prevents the application of this approach to large-scale problems.…”
Section: High-resolution Imaging Using Qpstmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to the conventional PSTM, the QPSTM approach involves performing an additional integral over all the frequencies, which is time consuming and prevents the application of this approach to large-scale problems. To improve the computational efficiency, Xu [3] distributed the heavy workload to graphics processing units (GPUs) and optimized the calculation at the programming level. Although the use of the GPUs is beneficial, the approach remains less efficient for solving realistic problems; for instance, performing a realistic 3D QPSTM can take several months even when using advanced GPU clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐domain imaging, especially prestack time migration (PSTM), has long been the standard imaging output of seismic data processing (Fomel, 2014; Garabito et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2012). In particular, the implementation of GPU parallel processing (Shi et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2018) has allowed PSTM to become the most practical and effective tool for real large‐scale 3D seismic imaging. The key for the PSTM to generate satisfactory migration results, that is, the results that accurately reflect the true subsurface structure, is the velocity model, which is obtained primarily by migration velocity analysis (MVA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%