9th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 1991
DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-3275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for incorporating computational fluid dynamics into sonic boom prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rear part of the signal, whatever the method, does not converge toward the undisturbed freestream state as it should. This is due to the numerical errors and instabilities of the system resolution as very high order expansion are considered as well as a high expansion order compared to the one usually found in the literature (see [9,12]). Furthermore, as the data extraction distance of r/L = 0.5 is small if compared to the commonly used one (r/L > 1), the matching must face stronger local gradients.…”
Section: Near-to Far-field Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rear part of the signal, whatever the method, does not converge toward the undisturbed freestream state as it should. This is due to the numerical errors and instabilities of the system resolution as very high order expansion are considered as well as a high expansion order compared to the one usually found in the literature (see [9,12]). Furthermore, as the data extraction distance of r/L = 0.5 is small if compared to the commonly used one (r/L > 1), the matching must face stronger local gradients.…”
Section: Near-to Far-field Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering the current knowledge and computational means, using a nonviscous CFD solver is very convenient to predict the near-¦eld pressure disturbances ¤far¥ from the viscous boundary layer region. The nonlinear 3D aeroacoustic distortion due to the propagation through the mid-¦eld is assessed using the matching method proposed by Page and Plotkin [9]. Finally, the long distance acoustic propagation through standard strati¦ed atmosphere is carried out with a speci¦c acoustic code.…”
Section: Three-layer Approach Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first method is to compute the surface pressures by using a CFD solver and then use numerical integration along the Mach plane cuts to generate equivalent area distributions. 12 The second method is to extract a CFD pressure off-body cylinder and apply multipole methods [13][14][15] to map the near-field pressures to their corresponding mid-field values so that the three dimensional cross-flow effects are taken care of before propagation to the ground. In the third approach, a CFD pressure solution that is obtained at several body lengths below the aircraft can be directly used for propagation to the ground.…”
Section: Sonic Boom Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the intensity of the sonic boom has usually been computed by obtaining a near-to-mid-field (<10 body lengths below the aircraft) pressure distribution (Δp/p) and extending it to ground level using atmospheric propagation methods. 4 Using unstructured grids, where it can be difficult to control the distribution and orientation of the field grid beneath the model, pressure signatures in the mid-field typically are insufficiently predicted. Improved results have been obtained using an error-driven adjoint-based grid adaptation method 5,6 , but multiple runs using the flow and adjoint solvers can make the process cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%