2009
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for the extraction of chloroplast proteins compatible for 2‐DE and MS analysis

Abstract: Comparative proteomic analysis of chloroplast by 2-DE has received significant attention in recent years. However, the complication of membrane systems in chloroplast made it challenging to elucidate entire chloroplast proteome by 2-DE. Here, we developed an efficient method for extracting chloroplast proteins, and produced excellent 2-DE profiles from both Arabidopsis thaliana and Salicornia europaea. Comparison of this method with another two protocols for the extraction of A. thaliana chloroplast proteins s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chloroplasts were isolated from WT and mta following a modified protocol [34]. Each step was performed at 4°C or on ice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chloroplasts were isolated from WT and mta following a modified protocol [34]. Each step was performed at 4°C or on ice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure for extracting proteins from chloroplasts was modified from the improved phenol (BPP) method [82]. Chloroplast pellets were re-suspended uniformly in ice-cold extraction buffer containing 100 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 100 mM EDTA, 50 mM borax, 50 mM vitamin C, 1% Triton X-100, 2% β-mercaptoethanol, and 30% sucrose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All selected spots were manually excised from the 2-DE gels. In-gel digestion and matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) fingerprint spectra acquisition were performed according to Fan et al52. The peptide mass fingerprints were searched against the NCBInr (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) protein databases using MASCOT Version 2.1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%