2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method to evaluate experimental factor influence on in vitro binding of aptamers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the binding percentages of PD-L1 from R1 to R3 by MB-SELEX were quite random, changing from 3.52% in R1 to 0.078% in R2 and 2.93% in R3 (Figure D). This phenomenon should be caused by the uncontrolled nonspecific absorption of DNAs on the magnetic beads and the low binding specificity of aptamers with the immobilized proteins on surface . Previously we reported that the binding specificity varied significantly ranging from 0.03 ± 0.03 to 14.60 ± 2.30.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the binding percentages of PD-L1 from R1 to R3 by MB-SELEX were quite random, changing from 3.52% in R1 to 0.078% in R2 and 2.93% in R3 (Figure D). This phenomenon should be caused by the uncontrolled nonspecific absorption of DNAs on the magnetic beads and the low binding specificity of aptamers with the immobilized proteins on surface . Previously we reported that the binding specificity varied significantly ranging from 0.03 ± 0.03 to 14.60 ± 2.30.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, target immobilization may result in many problems such as masking the target binding sites, changing the target natural conformation, and causing serious nonspecific absorption of the library on the solid phase matrix. These factors can cause the selection of aptamers to be inefficient or even fail . The library-immobilized methods for the selection of SSAs, or named falling-off-SELEX, avoid such problems, whereas the spontaneous dissociation of the immobilized library seriously limited the selection efficiency. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, immobilized targets were especially ill-suited for small molecules, where the immobilization itself is a difficult process due to the small molecular structure and the presence of fewer active sites for conjugation [ 32 ]. In other words, the aptamer screened by immobilized targets may be different from the aptamer screened by targets in the natural conformations [ 33 ]. Gu [ 34 ] and Ha [ 35 ] screened two STX aptamers through the immobilized libraries by graphene oxide SELEX (GO-SELEX), overcoming the obstacle that STX was difficult to immobilize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since SELEX emerged in 1990, many selection methods have been developed for isolating aptamers such as purified-protein-based SELEX, whole-cell-based SELEX, capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based SELEX, Capture-SELEX, and so on [27][28][29][30]. Due to the low successful rates for aptamer selection, several factors in selection process have still been studying [31][32][33]. Importantly, monitoring enriching progress of candidate aptamers has always been the key and restrictive step in SELEX process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%