2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method to solve the classification problem for remote sensing image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E 2 is closer to H 2 , therefore, the class of E 2 is the same of the class of H 5 . Also the class of E 3 is the same as the class of E 2 because only H 5 …”
Section: Ngementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E 2 is closer to H 2 , therefore, the class of E 2 is the same of the class of H 5 . Also the class of E 3 is the same as the class of E 2 because only H 5 …”
Section: Ngementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the k nearest neighbor (kNN) [2], and other kNN based methods [3][4][5], the decision are made by calculating the distance, which is a similarity measure [6], between the query and all the examples in the training set [7,8]. The optimum parameters such as weights and biases for an artificial neural network (ANN) are determined by utilizing whole training dataset, while training ANN by backpropagation [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods can be employed to produce LULC by employing remote sensing data (Purkis & Klemas, 2011;Lakshmi et al, 2015;Al-doski et al, 2013). However, it should be noted that in case land surface objects have a similar reflectance or a small area, most of them could not provide high accurate maps (Gao & Xu, 2016). Using low radiometric resolution imageries, land classification can be a serious challenge because of spectral mixing of different surface elements and landscape complexity (Julien et al, 2011;Stenzel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It characterizes the correlation among two samples of measurements taken from the classified area. With the use of the confusion matrix, measurement such as overall accuracy, user accuracy, producer accuracy and Kappa Coefficient can be calculated (Foody, 2002;Gao and Xu, 2014;Huang et al, 2002). The overall accuracy is determined by dividing the cumulative of the main diagonal items of the confusion matrix by the entire number of samples.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%