2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Multi-Level Convolutional Neural Network Approach for White Blood Cells Classification

Abstract: The evaluation of white blood cells is essential to assess the quality of the human immune system; however, the assessment of the blood smear depends on the pathologist’s expertise. Most machine learning tools make a one-level classification for white blood cell classification. This work presents a two-stage hybrid multi-level scheme that efficiently classifies four cell groups: lymphocytes and monocytes (mononuclear) and segmented neutrophils and eosinophils (polymorphonuclear). At the first level, a Faster R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changhun et al proposed a W-Net model in a combination of CNN with RNN with DCGANs for image synthesizing later used for WBC classification, and attained an accuracy of 97% for a 5 class dataset [ 34 ]. César Cheuque et al proposed the MLCNN detection of white blood cell Faster RCNN used to extract Region of interest later with Mobilenet based model is used to train the classification framework gained performance accuracy of 98.4% [ 35 ]. In continuation Next BCNet [ 36 ] to address the blood cell classification for three classes via transfer learning approach with ResNet18 as backbone model for learning and noted 96.78% accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changhun et al proposed a W-Net model in a combination of CNN with RNN with DCGANs for image synthesizing later used for WBC classification, and attained an accuracy of 97% for a 5 class dataset [ 34 ]. César Cheuque et al proposed the MLCNN detection of white blood cell Faster RCNN used to extract Region of interest later with Mobilenet based model is used to train the classification framework gained performance accuracy of 98.4% [ 35 ]. In continuation Next BCNet [ 36 ] to address the blood cell classification for three classes via transfer learning approach with ResNet18 as backbone model for learning and noted 96.78% accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They deployed the proposed approach on the Kaggle WBC images dataset and achieved significant accuracy. The study [ 16 ] proposed a multi-level CNN model for the WBC classification for four types of cell classification. At the first level, Faster R-CNN is applied for the detection of the region of interest while at the second level, CNN-based architecture MobileNet is used for cell-type classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes the literature in chronological order to provide a better understanding of the current status of the WBC classification methods along with the model architectures employed. As can be seen from the table, most previous methods highly relied on CNN-based architectures, such as AlexNet, MobileNet, etc., due to their efficiency in analyzing images, while these approaches have shown good performance in the WBC classification [8,24,28], extracting the features associated with distinct regions of the cell is still difficult to achieve. There exist subtle discrepancies among different cell types, which tend to be retained in textural information of shallow features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, researchers in the community have devised automatic yet faster approaches for analysis of leukocytes leveraging computer vision techniques [5][6][7][8][9]. Given the recent advancement of machine learning and computer vision, several approaches have been proposed for leukocyte classification and segmentation, ranging from more conventional machine learning models such as support vector machine [10] and Naïve Bayesian [11] to more advanced deep learning methods [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%