2017
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient on‐Line Parameter Identification Algorithm for Nonlinear Servomechanisms with an Algebraic Technique for State Estimation

Abstract: This paper presents a methodology for on-line closed-loop identification of a class of nonlinear servomechanisms. First, a system is defined with the same structure as the actual servomechanism, but using time-varying estimated parameters. No coupling between the actual and the estimation systems is present. Position, velocity and acceleration errors, defined as the difference of the actual respective signals and the signals coming from the estimation system, are required in the identification method. Then, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller closing the loop must stabilise the system with relatively low tracking error. Besides, this controller must not depend on the system parameters [4, 37]. These features allow selecting controllers consisting of a linear combination of x1false(tfalse), x2false(tfalse), and/or x1(τ)normaldτ.…”
Section: Model Description and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The controller closing the loop must stabilise the system with relatively low tracking error. Besides, this controller must not depend on the system parameters [4, 37]. These features allow selecting controllers consisting of a linear combination of x1false(tfalse), x2false(tfalse), and/or x1(τ)normaldτ.…”
Section: Model Description and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This absence may be cumbersome because x2false(tfalse),x˙2false(tfalse) are required for calculating ufalse(tfalse), f2false(x2false) and βfalse^. There are many solutions for computing these signals such as algebraic differentiators [4], sliding modes differrentiators [41], or the dirty derivative. In general, the worst estimation results are obtained using the dirty derivative [4].…”
Section: Algorithm Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Colorado has proposed a novel on-line closed-loop parameter identification algorithm for second order nonlinear systems, designed a cost function based on the optimization method by using a linear combination of the actual and an estimation system, and used algebraic techniques to estimate the velocity and acceleration signals, avoiding noise processing problems. This method converges faster than the online and off-line least squares algorithms, and has strong robustness against disturbance, but without requiring any type of data pre-processing [30], [31]. In addition, he has also proposed a first integrals and adaptive parameter identification method for conservative Hamiltonian systems, and discussed the parameter identification problem as an optimization one [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%