2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient optimal algorithm for the quantity discount problem in material requirement planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benton (1991), Munson and Rosenblatt (1998), and Munson and Jackson (2015) have analyzed the most relevant quantity discount scenarios from both the buyer's and seller's perspectives. In the recent decades, this practice has been studied mostly from a quantitative perspective in many different application contexts (dairy, chemical industry, project's resource investment, telecommunication systems) and considering many complicating factors such as multiple periods, multiple sites, inventory costs, buyers coalition, budgetary limitations and so on (see, e.g., McConnel and Galligan, 2004, van de Klundert et al, 2005, Mirmohammadi et al, 2009, Munson and Hu, 2010, Krichen et al, 2011, Jolai et al, 2013. Among the different existing policies (incremental discount, fixed fees, truckload discount), the total quantity discount (TQD) represents the most popular form applied so far and studied in the literature since it correctly models many multiproduct procurement settings where the purchase is completed at a single point in time, without any auctions or rebate mechanisms (Crama et al, 2004, Shahsavar et al, 2016.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benton (1991), Munson and Rosenblatt (1998), and Munson and Jackson (2015) have analyzed the most relevant quantity discount scenarios from both the buyer's and seller's perspectives. In the recent decades, this practice has been studied mostly from a quantitative perspective in many different application contexts (dairy, chemical industry, project's resource investment, telecommunication systems) and considering many complicating factors such as multiple periods, multiple sites, inventory costs, buyers coalition, budgetary limitations and so on (see, e.g., McConnel and Galligan, 2004, van de Klundert et al, 2005, Mirmohammadi et al, 2009, Munson and Hu, 2010, Krichen et al, 2011, Jolai et al, 2013. Among the different existing policies (incremental discount, fixed fees, truckload discount), the total quantity discount (TQD) represents the most popular form applied so far and studied in the literature since it correctly models many multiproduct procurement settings where the purchase is completed at a single point in time, without any auctions or rebate mechanisms (Crama et al, 2004, Shahsavar et al, 2016.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is outlined as follows. In Sections 2 and 3, (1) we investigate the research background of this problem, (2) we propose dynamic multiobjective optimization based on development prediction, and (3) we propose an evolutionary algorithm combined with dynamic strategy (RS/AS) to solve dynamic multiobjective optimization problem. In Section 4, we investigate two cases to clearly demonstrate the experimental process and to prove the effectiveness of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, no polynomial-time approximation algorithm with a constant worst-case ratio exists for the TQD problem (unless the complexity class P is equal to the complexity class N P ). More information on many variations on the TQD can be found in the literature (Goossens et al, 2007;Mirmohammadi et al, 2009;Munson and Hu, 2010;Krichen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%