1982
DOI: 10.1287/moor.7.3.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Optimal Algorithm for the Two-Machines Unit-Time Jobshop Schedule-Length Problem

Abstract: The problem of scheduling a two-machine unit-operation-time jobshop to complete all jobs as rapidly as possible is shown to be solved by the following rule. Select for service from available jobs at each stage one with longest remaining processing time. The running time and storage space of the rule are both linear functions of the total number of operations, thereby establishing that the problem belongs to P.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm generalizes recent results by Hefetz and Adiri (1979) who gave an algorithm for the corresponding makespan-problem. Such a problem is derived from P by setting d (i) = 0 for i= 1,..., r. In section 2 we will formulate the algorithm.…”
Section: *supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This algorithm generalizes recent results by Hefetz and Adiri (1979) who gave an algorithm for the corresponding makespan-problem. Such a problem is derived from P by setting d (i) = 0 for i= 1,..., r. In section 2 we will formulate the algorithm.…”
Section: *supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In a second step the tasks are to be scheduled according to this order. An algorithm proposed by Hefetz and Adiri (1979) proceeds exactly in this way. However, due to the special structure of the problem an O (n)-implementation is possible.…”
Section: Complexity Results For Related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4a) length < 3 (4b)* length < 4 (la) [Jackson, 1956); (lb) [Lenstra, Rinnooy Kau & Brucker, 1977); (2a) [Hefetz & Adiri, 1982); (2b) [Leustra & Riuuooy Kau, 1979); (3a) [Akers, 1956;Brucker, 1988); (3b) [Sotskov, 1091); (4a,b) [Williamson, Hall, Hoogeveen, Hurkens, Lenstra & Shmoys, 1994).…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the aforementioned jobshop problem is NP-complete on at least three machines [17], but polynomial on two machines with unitary processing times [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%