2015
DOI: 10.1080/0952813x.2015.1020521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient oscillating inertia weight of particle swarm optimisation for tracking optima in dynamic environments

Abstract: One of the effective techniques for improving the rate of convergence in the particle swarm optimisation (PSO) is modifying the inertia weight parameter. This parameter can specify the search area of the swarm in the environment and establish a good balance between the global and local search ability of the particles. Several strategies have been already suggested and well tested for setting the inertia weight in static environments. However, in dynamic environments, the effect of this parameter on increasing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inertia weight controls exploitation and exploration of the search space due to its capability of adjusting velocity (Mauro and Johann, 2011;Huynh and Dunnigan, 2012;Kordestani et al, 2016).…”
Section: Standard Pso Algorithm (Pso-s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inertia weight controls exploitation and exploration of the search space due to its capability of adjusting velocity (Mauro and Johann, 2011;Huynh and Dunnigan, 2012;Kordestani et al, 2016).…”
Section: Standard Pso Algorithm (Pso-s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [17] introduced a memory scheme to PSO that is triggered whenever the exploration of the population results in a peak to deal with dynamic environments. Recently, Kordestani et al [18] presented an oscillating triangular inertia weight in PSO, which is a time-varying inertia weight parameter, and investigated its performance on tracking optima in dynamic environments. The Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm has also been studied and adapted to work in dynamic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, various dynamic optimization problems have been proposed to investigate the population-based metaheuristic approaches in the dynamic environments. Among these problems is the Moving peaks benchmark by Branke [31] that was employed in many works such as those studies done by Blackwell and Branke [15,16], Turky and Abdullah [27], and Kordestani et al [18] and the DF1 generator developed by Morrison and De Jong [32] that was used for testing metaheuristics in dynamic environments in works like that performed by Tfaili et al [19]. However, there was no unified method for constructing dynamic optimization problems across the real space, combinatorial space, and binary space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides the AIWPSO, ABC and GABC algorithms introduced in Section 3, two new PSO methods that focus on the improvement of inertia weight and/or acceleration coefficients' parameters are adopted in order to make comparisons with our algorithm. One is the low-discrepancy sequence initialized PSO algorithm with high-order nonlinear time-varying inertia weight (LHNPSO) [36] and the other is the oscillating triangular inertia weight PSO (OTIWPSO) [37]. We apply these methods to the grasping posture control problem and compare the convergence performance and convergence time with the proposed AIWCPSO and AIWCPSO-S algorithms.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%