2004
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200305795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient protocol for the identification of protein phosphorylation in a seedless plant, sensitive enough to detect members of signalling cascades

Abstract: We describe a reproducible protocol to explore for the first time the phosphoproteome of a seedless plant, the moss Physcomitrella patens. Following tryptic digestion of a total protein extract, phosphorylated peptides were isolated using the combination of C18 reverse-phase chromatography (RP-C18), immobilized Fe(3+) metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of fligh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In-gel digestion of proteins was performed with an automated protein digestion system, MassPREP Station (Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom), as described previously (39). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) measurements was carried out with an Ultraflex TOF/TOF (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), which was operated in the reflectron positive mode as previously described (18). Protein identification was made by peptide mass fingerprinting using the MASCOT program (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom) and interrogation of different protein databases: the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology) nonredundant protein database, SwissProt, and TrEMBL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In-gel digestion of proteins was performed with an automated protein digestion system, MassPREP Station (Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom), as described previously (39). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) measurements was carried out with an Ultraflex TOF/TOF (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), which was operated in the reflectron positive mode as previously described (18). Protein identification was made by peptide mass fingerprinting using the MASCOT program (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom) and interrogation of different protein databases: the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology) nonredundant protein database, SwissProt, and TrEMBL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein identification was made by peptide mass fingerprinting using the MASCOT program (Matrix Science, London, United Kingdom) and interrogation of different protein databases: the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology) nonredundant protein database, SwissProt, and TrEMBL. Additionally, protein identification was made by nanoscale capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described previously (18). Briefly, analysis of the digested proteins was performed using a CapLC capillary LC system (Waters) coupled to a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer, Q-TOF II (Waters).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the few examples, phosphoproteins of Arabidopsis plasma membranes (23) and phosphoproteins in the moss Physcomitrella patens (9) have been characterized. Here, we have enriched phosphoproteins from C. reinhardtii by using IMAC in combination with Ga 3ϩ as the metal component.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the most suitable detection method that meets such criteria is still under consideration, there are several candidates, such as 1) fluorescent labeling, [31,32] 2) isotopic labeling, [33,49] 3) chemiluminesent labeling, [69] 4) mass spectrometry, [70] 5) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy, [71][72][73][74][75] 6) anomalous reflections (AR) of the gold surface, [76] 7) quartz-crystal microbalance (QCM) analysis, [77][78][79] 8) fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), [80][81][82] and 9) electrochemical detection ( Figure 3). It is necessary to label with fluorescent probes for the methods 1 and 8, with radioisotopes for method 2, with an adequate functional group/molecule for method 3, and with electrically active probes for method 9, but no labeling at all is necessary for the other methods (4-7).…”
Section: Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%