2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3037135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Ray-Tracing Based Model Dedicated to Wireless Sensor Network Simulators for Smart Cities Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them achieve an average standard deviation of about 7 dB up to 9 dB. Also newer publications validate their introduced path loss prediction algorithms and acceleration techniques with the Mannesmann Munich dataset [29]- [32]. The standard deviation of these models is similarly within the above-mentioned value range.…”
Section: Validation Of Ray Tracing Pathloss Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most of them achieve an average standard deviation of about 7 dB up to 9 dB. Also newer publications validate their introduced path loss prediction algorithms and acceleration techniques with the Mannesmann Munich dataset [29]- [32]. The standard deviation of these models is similarly within the above-mentioned value range.…”
Section: Validation Of Ray Tracing Pathloss Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As a result of the analysis of research method 1, 249 (65.0%) of the total 383 quantitative studies constituted the highest number of those published, followed by 114 (29.8%) qualitative studies and 20 (5.2%) mixed studies (Table 4). The high number of quantitative studies includes statistical methods for data analysis (Alablani and Alenazi; Munjal et al) [31,32] and computer simulations for algorithm analysis (Reddy et al; Alwajee et al) [33,34]. Mixed studies include research that conducted both surveys and case studies (Deveci et al) [35], computer simulation and case studies (Elseidi et al) [36], literature research and survey research (Kirimtat et al) [37], and literature and case studies (Malik et al) [38].…”
Section: Results Of Research Methods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why experimental methods accounted for the largest portion with 241 papers is that among the papers to be studied, papers in the field of science and technology account for a large portion. The main papers of the experimental method are multidimensional modeling (Jia and Wu) [39] for sustainable smart cities (Alwajeeh, Combeau and Avenau) [33] and crowd management systems (Santana et al) [40] capable of detecting personal information. Literature research methods mainly consisted of an efficient smart city service framework (Li) [41] or a study comparing smart city services in various cities (Balasubramaniam) [42].…”
Section: Results Of Research Methods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the coverage, we use the ray-tracing method, which is one of the most efficient in terms of and realism [40] and allows to accurately compute the coverage area [19]. Its principle is to generate an image in which each pixel is independently processed [41]. A ray is launched from the camera towards the plane, and at each intersection, the nature and position of the corresponding pixel is determined [42].…”
Section: Sensor Modeling and Observation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%