2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient reconfiguration scheme for fault-tolerant meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same assumptions as in [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], all switches and interconnects in an array are assumed to be fault-free. This assumption is justified since the switches and links use much less hardware resources when compared to the PEs and are thus less vulnerable to faults.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same assumptions as in [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], all switches and interconnects in an array are assumed to be fault-free. This assumption is justified since the switches and links use much less hardware resources when compared to the PEs and are thus less vulnerable to faults.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported approaches on the switch-based architecture can be classified into two categories, i.e., the redundancy approach [24], [25], [26], [27] and the degradation approach. The former replaces faulty PEs using spare ones to obtain a logical array with a guaranteed size, while the latter tries to provide a target array as large as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a mesh‐connected processor array, numerous studies on fault tolerance have been undertaken in recent years, primarily focusing on two methods for fault‐tolerant techniques, namely the redundancy approach and the degradation approach. In the redundancy approach, a system is constructed to include several spare PEs, which are utilized to replace faulty PEs in the reconfigurable system . The main drawback of this approach is that, if the number of spare PEs is insufficient to replace all the faulty PEs, then the system cannot be reconfigured and must be discarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the redundancy approach, the system is built with some spare PEs, which are used to directly replace the faulty PEs in the reconfigurable system. Varieties of techniques are described in the literatures to restructure a faulty physical system into a faultfree target logical system with spare rows and columns [1,2]. However, the main drawback of this approach is the fixed size of a reconfigured array; that is, the system cannot be reconfigured and has to be discarded if the spare PEs cannot replace all the faulty PEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%