2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-018-1975-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient reliability analysis method combining adaptive Kriging and modified importance sampling for small failure probability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kriging models must memorize the entire training dataset, and thus the training process becomes intractable for large training datasets. There are some approaches (such as the adaptive Kriging combined with importance sampling method [33]) to improve efficiency in designing the training dataset, however, for a given training database, the comparison between Model 2 and Model 3 clearly shows how the type of surrogate model affects the prediction performance. The same number of 5,000 training samples are used in Model 2 and Model 3, and Model 3 using MLP lowers ,Test by 32% compared to Model 2 using Kriging.…”
Section: Kriging Vs Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging models must memorize the entire training dataset, and thus the training process becomes intractable for large training datasets. There are some approaches (such as the adaptive Kriging combined with importance sampling method [33]) to improve efficiency in designing the training dataset, however, for a given training database, the comparison between Model 2 and Model 3 clearly shows how the type of surrogate model affects the prediction performance. The same number of 5,000 training samples are used in Model 2 and Model 3, and Model 3 using MLP lowers ,Test by 32% compared to Model 2 using Kriging.…”
Section: Kriging Vs Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An application to structural reliability can be found in [3] and one to fracture mechanics in [20]. The limit state function can also be represented using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model [21,22], a Kriging model [5,23], a polynomial chaos expansion [24] as well as based on statistical learning theory [25]. These surrogate models are usually black box models that rely on a set of training samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although both methods can be adopted for systems with implicit performance function, the extremely inaccurate results may be yielded for highly nonlinear performance functions. Therefore, the use of metamodels which can replace the procedure of simulating calculations is an alternative way in reliability analysis, such as the response surface model, 21,22 the artificial neural networks, 23,24 the Kriging model, [25][26][27][28][29] and the support vector machine. [30][31][32] In recent years, the adaptive sequential sampling method using Kriging has been conducted more than other surrogate models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%