An efficient routing protocol based on polar tracing function for underwater wireless sensor networks for mobility health monitoring system application

Venkateswaralu, Balaji Vijayan; Neduncheliyan, S.; Ramamurthy, Sivakumar

doi:10.1007/s10916-019-1352-z

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To begin balancing the network's energy consumption, the nodes are divided into smaller groups, which are subsequently managed by temporary forwarding nodes. In each round of the competition, the forwarding nodes must collect data from the subset of nodes to which they are connected via a single hop of communication [28]. Using the suggested Media Access Control (MAC) protocol, which requires regular nodes to transfer their data to their forwarding nodes only during designated time slots, decreases the chance of collisions and the quantity of data lost.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

CEER: Cooperative Energy-Efficient Routing Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using Clusters

Shah¹,

Hussain²,

Shah³

et al. 2023

CSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWASNs) aim to find varied offshore ocean monitoring and exploration applications. In most of these applications, the network is composed of several sensor nodes deployed at different depths in the water. Sensor nodes located at depth on the seafloor cannot invariably communicate with nodes close to the surface level; these nodes need multihop communication facilitated by a suitable routing scheme. In this research work, a Cluster-based Cooperative Energy Efficient Routing (CEER) mechanism for UWSNs is proposed to overcome the shortcomings of the Co-UWSN and LEACH mechanisms. The optimal role of clustering and cooperation provides load balancing and improves the network profoundly. The simulation results using MATLAB show better performance of CEER routing protocol in terms of various parameters as compared to Co-UWSN routing protocol, i.e., the average end-to-end delay of CEER was 17.39, Co-UWSN was 55.819 and LEACH was 70.08. In addition, the average total energy consumption of CEER was 9.273, and LEACH was 45.33. The packet delivery ratio of CEER was 53.955, CO-UWSN was 42.047, and LEACH was 30.31. The stability period CEER was 130.9, CO-UWSN was 129.3, and LEACH was 119.1. The obtained results maximized the lifetime and improved the overall performance of the CEER routing protocol.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

CEER: Cooperative Energy-Efficient Routing Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using Clusters

Shah¹,

Hussain²,

Shah³

et al. 2023

CSSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A grid division polar tracing routing protocol function was proposed by Venkateswarulu et al 62 that incorporates cubic grids and polar tracing functions to reduce energy usage. However, congestion control and QoS for diverse underwater conditions are not implemented utilizing cross‐layer methods.…”

Section: Wireless Sensor Network That Operate Underwater—applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Taxonomy on applications, architectures, localization methods, deployment techniques, routing techniques, and threats: A systematic review

Gola

Arya

2023

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryWireless information routing beneath the ocean, or usually underwater, has supplied the most excellent technical methods of oceanic observations. Traditionally, ocean bottoms have been monitored by placing oceanographic sensors that collect data at specific and defined ocean zones. When the duties are performed, the oceanographic instruments are recovered. Because there is no collaborative exchange of collected data between the collecting point and the monitoring end, data cannot be observed remotely. Underwater sensor networks can be wirelessly connected with sensors and monitors without extensive cable. Underwater wireless sensor networks are what they are called (UWSNs). This article investigates the various aspects of UWSNs, such as their significance, applications, network design, demands, routing, deployments and challenges.

show abstract

“…Majority of the research done in UWSNs environment have energy efficiency as primary concern because the sensor nodes in UWSNs environment are operated on built-in battery having limited life time. The research conducted in [39]- [47] proposed different energy efficient routing protocol for UWSNs environment. Security is equally important to energy efficiency in the UWSNs environment.…”

Section: Motivation and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

SEECR: Secure Energy Efficient and Cooperative Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) is an emerging technology for exploration of underwater resources. Security plays an important role in the UWSNs environment because the environment of UWSNs is prone to different security attacks. This research proposes SEECR: Secure Energy Efficient and Cooperative Routing protocol for UWSNs. SEECR comprised of energy efficient and strong defense mechanism for combatting attacks in underwater environment. SEECR exploits cooperative routing for enhancing the performance of network. Considering the resource constrained UWSNs environment minimum computation is employed for implementing security so that SEECR remains suitable for underwater environment. In order to evaluate the performance of SEECR, this research compares the performance of SEECR with AMCTD: Adaptive Mobility of Courier Nodes in Threshold-optimized DBR-a wellknown routing protocol for UWSNs environment. The performance of SEECR and AMCTD protocols are evaluated using different performance evaluation parameters such as number of alive nodes, transmission loss, throughput, energy tax and end-to-end delay. The results suggest an improved performance of SEECR over AMCTD. SEECR shows an improvement of 9% in terms of number of alive nodes, over 50% reduction in terms of transmission loss, up to 9% increase in throughput, up to 23% reduction in energy tax, and 25% reduction in end-to-end delay. Further, we observe that attack significantly degrades the performance of AMCTD whereas due to the embedded defense mechanism in SEECR the impact of attack is negligible.

show abstract

An efficient routing protocol based on polar tracing function for underwater wireless sensor networks for mobility health monitoring system application

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

CEER: Cooperative Energy-Efficient Routing Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using Clusters

CEER: Cooperative Energy-Efficient Routing Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using Clusters

Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Taxonomy on applications, architectures, localization methods, deployment techniques, routing techniques, and threats: A systematic review

SEECR: Secure Energy Efficient and Cooperative Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About