2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2008.04.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Solution for Model Checking Graph Transformation Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is not easy to prove, but using model checking [15,16] we can prove some properties are hold.…”
Section: Semantic Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This property is not easy to prove, but using model checking [15,16] we can prove some properties are hold.…”
Section: Semantic Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Model checking approaches to analyze GT systems are similar to our approach as they also perform state space exploration. One can categorize them as compiled approaches such as Schmidt and Varró (2003), Edelkamp et al (2006), Baresi et al (2008), dos Santos et al (2004), Baresi and Spoletini (2006), which translate graphs and GT rules into off-the-shelf model checkers to carry out verification, and interpreted approaches like Rensink (2004a), Baldan and König (2002), König and Kozioura (2006), which store system states as graphs and directly apply transformation rules to explore the state space, similarly to our approach. They place emphasis on exhaustive traversal (e.g.…”
Section: Graph Transformation Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It must be complemented with useful analysis capabilities to let the designer understand the correctness of the behavior of the system [26]. Even with the use of a highlevel and applicable methodology of specifications, such as graph transformation as a mechanism for designing systems, yet it is possible that a designer incorporate some errors in the designed model.…”
Section: Verification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%