2016
DOI: 10.13005/ojc/320427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient, Solvent Free One Pot Synthesis of Tetra substitue dimidazoles Catalyzed by Nanocrystalline γ-alumina

Abstract: γ-Alumina nanoparticles (γ-Al 2 O 3 NPs) have been successfully synthesized by electrochemical reduction method. The aqueous solution of tetrapropylammonium bromide was used as an electrolyte cum stabilizer. To prevent spontaneous agglomeration and control nanoparticles size various parameter such as current density, distance between electrodes and concentrations of electrolyte are optimized. γ-Al 2 O 3 NPs thus synthesized were characterized by sophisticated analytical techniques including X-ray diffraction, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffraction peaks of the nano γ-alumina are indicated at 32.81°, 36.72°, 45.38°, 66.59°, and 67.24° at d-spacings of 2.726, 2.446, 1.996, 1.403 and 1.391 Å respectively. These peaks correspond to the crystallographic planes of (220), (311), (400), (422), and (440) reflections of γ-Al2O3 respectively [37][38][39]. No peaks of impurities were observed.…”
Section: Characterization Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The diffraction peaks of the nano γ-alumina are indicated at 32.81°, 36.72°, 45.38°, 66.59°, and 67.24° at d-spacings of 2.726, 2.446, 1.996, 1.403 and 1.391 Å respectively. These peaks correspond to the crystallographic planes of (220), (311), (400), (422), and (440) reflections of γ-Al2O3 respectively [37][38][39]. No peaks of impurities were observed.…”
Section: Characterization Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…148–150°C (lit. 29 150–154°C); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‐d6) δ 7.69–7.65 (m, 2H), 7.49–7.40 (m, 8H), 7.30 (m, 2H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 5.09 (s, 2H), 3.65 (s, 3H).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%