2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 2010
DOI: 10.1109/focs.2010.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Test for Product States with Applications to Quantum Merlin-Arthur Games

Abstract: We give a test that can distinguish efficiently between product states of n quantum systems and states which are far from product. If applied to a state |ψ whose maximum overlap with a product state is 1 − , the test passes with probability 1 − Θ( ), regardless of n or the local dimensions of the individual systems. The test uses two copies of |ψ . We prove correctness of this test as a special case of a more general result regarding stability of maximum output purity of the depolarising channel.A key applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
118
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the biggest open question in the study of quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems is whether QMA ¼ QMAð2Þ [note that Harrow and Montanaro have proved that QMAð2Þ ¼ QMAðkÞ for any polynomial k > 2 [37]]. On the one hand, there are natural problems from quantum physics that are in QMA(2) but not obviously in QMA [21,22,39].…”
Section: H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Arguably, the biggest open question in the study of quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems is whether QMA ¼ QMAð2Þ [note that Harrow and Montanaro have proved that QMAð2Þ ¼ QMAðkÞ for any polynomial k > 2 [37]]. On the one hand, there are natural problems from quantum physics that are in QMA(2) but not obviously in QMA [21,22,39].…”
Section: H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would, accordingly, give stronger applications, and possibly, solve the QMA vs QMA(2) puzzle due to the result of [37]. Another open question is, in Theorem 1, for a state supported on the symmetric subspace (also known as the Bose-symmetric state), whether its reduced states have pure-state approximations of the form R φ ⊗k dμðφÞ with φ pure.…”
Section: H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(See Table 1 for a summary of such results. ) Harrow and Montanaro [13] recently answered several open problems regarding the class QMA(κ), by proving that amplification within QMA(κ) is possible and that QMA(poly(N)) = QMA(2); the "collapse" is achieved by giving an analysis of a product test, which allows a verifier to use the unentanglement promise of only two registers to ensure that states within a single register are close to a separable state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harrow and Montanaro [13], through their product test, reduce the number of provers of [1] to only two, thereby obtaining a two-prover QMA protocol for 3SAT, with perfect completeness and constant soundness gap, where each prover sends Θ( √ N) qubits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%