An efficient two stage encryption for securing personal health records in cloud computing

Chennam, Krishna Keerthi; Muddana, Akkalakshmi

doi:10.1504/ijsoi.2018.10018731

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Pictorial representation of the results from the risk of bias analysis indicating low to moderate risk of bias presented in the studies 14 – 20 , 23 – 26 , 39 . The figure was generated with the online RobVis tool.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The response ratio was examined on 20 substudies, looking at mean encryption times, which demonstrated an effect size estimate of 0.16 ms. The literature review of the meta-analysed articles presented several studies on encryption (800–1200 ms 20 , 8654-10025 ms 23 , 29-98 ms 24 , 80-5040 ms 25 , 9919–280 ms 12 , 8–12 ms 16 , and one team compared six schemes (Blowfish, RSA, ASE, El-Gamal, ECC, Modified El-Gamal, and Modified ECC) with ranges 0.00006–0.03 ms 17 , and where the meta-analysis gave a pooled effect size estimate of 81 ms, an effect size estimate of 1.86 ms and p = 0.0005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is a PHR benchmark, which future studies could improve. Several studies presented decryption, e.g., 4236–7546 ms 20 , 23 , 16–74 ms 24 , 30–2290 ms 25 , 4–12 ms 26 , 90–71,167 ms 12 . Moreover, one team compared six schemes (Blowfish, RSA, ASE, El-Gamal, ECC, Modified El-Gamal, and Modified ECC) with ranges 0.000086–0.00054 ms 17 , The meta-analysis gave a pooled effect size estimate of 59.5 ms, an effect size estimate of 1.7 ms and p = 0.0005) performances for proposed algorithms and security solutions 27 – 31 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Lidströmer,

Davids,

ElSharkawy

et al. 2024

Nat Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cloud-based personal health records increase globally. The GPOC series introduces the concept of a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC) of personal health records. Here, we present the GPOC series’ Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registered and Preferred Reporting Items Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review and meta-analysis. It examines cloud-based personal health records and factors such as data security, efficiency, privacy and cost-based measures. It is a meta-analysis of twelve relevant axes encompassing performance, cryptography and parameters based on efficiency (runtimes, key generation times), security (access policies, encryption, decryption) and cost (gas). This aims to generate a basis for further research, a GPOC sandbox model, and a possible construction of a global platform. This area lacks standard and shows marked heterogeneity. A consensus within this field would be beneficial to the development of a GPOC. A GPOC could spark the development and global dissemination of artificial intelligence in healthcare.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Lidströmer,

Davids,

ElSharkawy

et al. 2024

Nat Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The response ratio was performed on 20 substudies looking at mean encryption times which demonstrated an effect size estimate of 0.16milliseconds. The literature review of the meta-analysed articles presented several studies on encryption (Abaid et al presented 800-1200 ms, 16 Chennam et al 8654-10025 ms, 17 Florence et al 29-98 ms, 18 Kocabas et al 80-5040 ms, 19 Preetha 9,919-280.43 ms, 8 Saravannan et al 8-11.7 ms, and Sukte et al compared six schemes (Blow sh, RSA, ASE, El-Gamal, ECC, Modi ed El-Gamal, and Modi ed ECC) with ranges 0.000058-0.027614 ms, 13 and where the metaanalysis gave a pooled effect size estimate of 80.76 milliseconds, an effect size estimate of 1.86 milliseconds and p = 0.0005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Davids

El-Sharkawy

Herlenius³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current geopolitical tensions together with the global pandemic have provided important lessons for the need to independently re-evaluate our healthcare needs, guide and promote patient self-awareness and patient-centred care and to consider how cross-border medical information needs have become connected. The pandemic and war have also led to various humanitarian and healthcare crises for which there’s a need to re-evaluate and develop technologies to better manage Personal Health Records (PHRs) for displaced refugees with chronic diseases crossing borders. The recent trend of mobile platform-based, and electronic health record for e-health technologies enabled cloud-based PHR management as a paradigm for patient centred care. However, these platforms are yet to gain use-ubiquity globally. Here we performed a Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registered and Preferred Reporting Items Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided systematic review and meta-analysis of the Personal Health Record looking at outcomes such as data security, efficiency, privacy, cost-based measures to generate a benchmark for future studies in this area. A meta-analysis of twelve axes for a future Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC) highlight the potential in health economics, performance, cryptography and speed of the basic techniques that are currently available, that would facilitate the construction of a GPOC. Whilst the field is early in its development, we highlight barriers, limitations and solutions through a proposed global consensus to ensure appropriate value delivery, safety and ethical governance for global digital personal health record adoption that can fundamentally beneficially transform the future of healthcare.

show abstract

An efficient two stage encryption for securing personal health records in cloud computing

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About