1982
DOI: 10.1080/03637758209376087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This disruption in intersubjectivity accounts for the low-involved person's withdrawal or distance from interaction. Although it may be caused by several factors, previous research findings on involvement and various trait-like measures provide some direction in this regard (Cegala, 1982a(Cegala, , 1982cCegala et al, 1982).…”
Section: Interaction Involvement and Affectmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This disruption in intersubjectivity accounts for the low-involved person's withdrawal or distance from interaction. Although it may be caused by several factors, previous research findings on involvement and various trait-like measures provide some direction in this regard (Cegala, 1982a(Cegala, , 1982cCegala et al, 1982).…”
Section: Interaction Involvement and Affectmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A study by Cegala et al (1982) examined the nonverbal behavior of high-and low-involved persons conversing with a stranger. Highly involved males manifested less body-focused gestures and overall body movement while speaking.…”
Section: Communication Monographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide evidence of construct validity for the active component of AEL, two measures of conversational involvement were administered. First, the 18-item Interaction Involvement Scale (Cegala, Savage, Brunner, & Conrad, 1982) was employed as a measure of three dimensions of II-attentiveness, perceptiveness, and responsiveness; each scale is responded to on 5-point Likert scales. Consequently, participants were assigned three scores, one for each dimension: attentiveness (a ¼ .74), perceptiveness (a ¼ .65), and responsiveness (a ¼ .81).…”
Section: Communication Quarterly 281mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concepts include "person-centered messages" (Applegate & Sypher, 1988) that generally require speakers to recognize another person's perspectives and contain a quality of sensitivity, engagement, and concern for relational cohesion. Such behavioral characteristics are consistent with the meaning of related concepts including: "adaptability" (Kim, 1991), "behavioral flexibility" (Samter, Burleson, & Basden-Murphy, 1989), "convergent behavior" (Gallois, Ogay, & Giles, 2005), "alignment talk" (Hopper, 1986), "emphathic listening" (Rosenfeld & Hancks, 1990), and "responsiveness" (Cegala, Savage, Brunner, & Conrad, 1982).…”
Section: Synchrony-fostering Communication Behaviors: Individuation Amentioning
confidence: 51%