2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-023-01240-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electroaffinity labelling platform for chemoproteomic-based target identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges that we encountered obtaining high coverage for BCR and ABL1 align with prior chemoproteomic studies that sought to analyze BCR-ABL1-dasatinib interactions 30,89 and provides compelling evidence to support the need for new protein interaction mapping technologies that afford enhanced labeling efficiency to better capture low abundance protein targets using clinically relevant probe concentrations. The nascent photocatalytic labeling technologies, such as μMap 79,90,91 , together with electrochemical approaches 107 , latent electrophile approaches, such as the fluorosulfates used by inverse drug discovery 108 and ligand-directed (LD) chemistry 109,110 , are intriguing alternatives that may allow for target engagement studies using more clinically relevant drug and probe concentrations. The latter chemistries together with other non-light based platforms such as the recently reported BioTac approach 83 , are expected to be uniquely suited to in vivo applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges that we encountered obtaining high coverage for BCR and ABL1 align with prior chemoproteomic studies that sought to analyze BCR-ABL1-dasatinib interactions 30,89 and provides compelling evidence to support the need for new protein interaction mapping technologies that afford enhanced labeling efficiency to better capture low abundance protein targets using clinically relevant probe concentrations. The nascent photocatalytic labeling technologies, such as μMap 79,90,91 , together with electrochemical approaches 107 , latent electrophile approaches, such as the fluorosulfates used by inverse drug discovery 108 and ligand-directed (LD) chemistry 109,110 , are intriguing alternatives that may allow for target engagement studies using more clinically relevant drug and probe concentrations. The latter chemistries together with other non-light based platforms such as the recently reported BioTac approach 83 , are expected to be uniquely suited to in vivo applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the immobilization process often causes activity impairment of active molecules and solidphase carriers also bring significant steric hindrance to the active molecules, which will be unfavorable for binding targets and active molecules. Active probes have developed rapidly, have flexible functional designs, and have been successfully applied in target identification [34], cell imaging [35], and biomarker detection [36]. In the section on target identification, active probes usually require additional enrichment methods.…”
Section: Application Of Protacs In Target Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modification of these functional groups has improved on their utility in PAL experiments. Recent innovations have opened new directions for labeling experiments that rely on triggered probe activation in cells, including blue light-activated, [83] IRactivated, [128] or electrochemically-activated chemistries, [129] each of which enable new experimental conditions that avoid damaging UV light or allow experiments in tissue samples that are normally inaccessible with traditional PAL chemistries. In addition, the development of more high-efficiency chemistries that target specific amino acids, such as 2,5-tetrazoles, can enable activity-based protein profiling experiments that are traditionally only performed with covalent labeling chemistries.…”
Section: Future Directions Of Pal Chemistriesmentioning
confidence: 99%