2010
DOI: 10.1039/b911672a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrochemical molecular switch for one-step, reusable detection of a single-base mutation of DNA

Abstract: A new strategy for one-step, reusable and sensitive detection of a single-base mutation based on an electrochemical molecular switch is developed in the present work. When the hybridization reaction takes place in the presence of target DNA, the Fc-labeled terminal of the open switch molecule can be captured by the probe through the predesigned complementary bases of both sequences. By this method, a signal-on sensor featuring both generalizability and simplicity towards reagentless detection of DNA with sensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Owing to the low electroactive background typically observed in clinical samples, and the promising response speed, cost and convenience of microelectronics, 6,7 electrochemical methods for DNA detection have attracted increasing attention in recent years. [8][9][10][11][12][13] At least a dozen electrochemical DNA sensing approaches have been developed to date, specifically; the Plaxco group and others have developed a label-free, reusable, near realtime electrochemical DNA (E-DNA) sensing platform. [14][15][16][17] As an electrochemical equivalent of the optical ''molecular beacon'' detection system, the E-DNA sensor is comprised of a redoxlabeled stem-loop or linear DNA probe covalently attached to an interrogating electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Owing to the low electroactive background typically observed in clinical samples, and the promising response speed, cost and convenience of microelectronics, 6,7 electrochemical methods for DNA detection have attracted increasing attention in recent years. [8][9][10][11][12][13] At least a dozen electrochemical DNA sensing approaches have been developed to date, specifically; the Plaxco group and others have developed a label-free, reusable, near realtime electrochemical DNA (E-DNA) sensing platform. [14][15][16][17] As an electrochemical equivalent of the optical ''molecular beacon'' detection system, the E-DNA sensor is comprised of a redoxlabeled stem-loop or linear DNA probe covalently attached to an interrogating electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection limit was confirmed to be ∼2 fM (S/N = 3). This detection limit is much lower than that obtained from the most part of "signal-on" E-DNA sensors reported without using above-mentioned amplification methods [16][17][18][19][20]. Such high sensitivity can be ascribed to the synergism of three aspects, multi-redox labels, background suppression and large surface area Au electrode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…However, such class of methods suffer from several drawbacks including complex handling procedures, not robust enough for detection, weak working capability and vulnerability to contamination in complex matrixes. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, several E-DNA sensors without using abovementioned amplification methods have since been developed [16][17][18][19]. Though most of drawbacks have been alleviated to some extent, the problem of weak working capability in real complex samples still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After hybridization, when interrogated with ACV at 20 Hz, we observed a large increase in MB current ( $ 0.21 μA). For this class of sensors, the change in the distance between the indicator of probe and the electrode surface often parallels the change in the rate of electron transport and the resultant redox current (Jin et al, 2010;Xiao et al, 2005Xiao et al, , 2006. In this case, the increase in the MB current can be attributed to the formation of 13-base DNA duplex between the target DNA and the SP.…”
Section: Sensor Characterization Using Alternating Current Voltammetrmentioning
confidence: 97%