1987
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(87)90215-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electron microprobe and cathodoluminescence study of chemical reactions between tool and workpiece when turning steel with alumina-based ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiao [4] has observed that zirconia toughened alumina ceramic cutting tools and TiC mixed alumina ceramic tools are more suitable for machining hardened steel than other ceramic tools because of their superior flank wear resistance. Brandt and Mikus [5] have observed that the crater wear in alumina-based ceramic tools also affects the performance of the ceramic tools and crater wear in these tools is predominantly dependent on superficial plastic deformation when machining steel. Richards and Aspinwall [6] have observed that the tool life of mixed alumina ceramic tool is severely limited due to excessive notching, when machining nickel-based alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao [4] has observed that zirconia toughened alumina ceramic cutting tools and TiC mixed alumina ceramic tools are more suitable for machining hardened steel than other ceramic tools because of their superior flank wear resistance. Brandt and Mikus [5] have observed that the crater wear in alumina-based ceramic tools also affects the performance of the ceramic tools and crater wear in these tools is predominantly dependent on superficial plastic deformation when machining steel. Richards and Aspinwall [6] have observed that the tool life of mixed alumina ceramic tool is severely limited due to excessive notching, when machining nickel-based alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equation (1), normal stress on rake face can be obtained from maximum normal stress q^m ax , surface position x and chip-tool contact length //, with maximum normal stress given by average friction coefficient, average shear strength and ratio between sticking zone and chip-tool contact length [9]. The expression provided by C. Arcona and T.A.…”
Section: Normal Stress At Tool Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tool wear simulation, normal stress variation along chip-tool interface can be described by Zorev's model [9], and a uniform distribution can be considered on flank face. According to Equation (1), normal stress on rake face can be obtained from maximum normal stress q^m ax , surface position x and chip-tool contact length //, with maximum normal stress given by average friction coefficient, average shear strength and ratio between sticking zone and chip-tool contact length [9].…”
Section: Normal Stress At Tool Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alumina cutting tools when machining steels are known to react with formation of iron based spinels of Fe 2 O 3 -Al 2 O 3 [16] and FeO-Al 2 O 3 [17]. Extensive use of magnesia as deoxidizer in steels and Alloy 718 [2] can lead to formation of MgO-Al 2 O 3 or more complex spinel of Fe-Mg-Al-O system [18]. Most of the reaction products become either plastic or liquefy under the cutting temperature thus forming tribolayer on the tool surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%