1996
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(95)00086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An elemental characterization of strong primeness in Jordan systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proof given in this paper cannot be considered an alternative to the proof by McCrimmon in [9]. Indeed the results of this paper are based on the results of [5], which depend on the inheritance of regularity by local algebras proved in [6]. These latter results are based on the results by McCrimmon [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the proof given in this paper cannot be considered an alternative to the proof by McCrimmon in [9]. Indeed the results of this paper are based on the results of [5], which depend on the inheritance of regularity by local algebras proved in [6]. These latter results are based on the results by McCrimmon [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The proof follows from the corresponding results on inheritance of regularity conditions by subquotients [3,5,6,8], once it is shown that V 0 and V 2 are isomorphic to certain subquotients of V .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A particularly important example of special Jordan pairs is ample subpairs of an associative pair with involution w x 7, 1. 7 . Similar constructions lead to the notions of special Jordan triple systems and algebras, together with the particular cases of ample subw x spaces of associative triple systems and algebras with involution 2, 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For a ∈ R, the a-homotope of R, denoted by R a , is the associative algebra over the same linear structure as R with the new product x · a y = xay. It is readily seen that the set Ker a = x ∈ R axa = 0 is an ideal of R a , so we can consider the local algebra R a /Ker a , which will be denoted by R a .A number of properties of Jordan systems are inherited by their local algebras (see [DAMc,ACLMc,ACMo2,AC]) and also lifted from local algebras to the whole Jordan system. In particular, the local algebras of a nondegenerate Jordan algebra J are nondegenerate, and we have U a z ∈ ann J x ⇒z ∈ ann J a x (1.17) which follows from the nondegenerate annihilator conditions…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%