An elicitation process to quantify Bayesian networks for dam failure analysis

Abstract

Bayesian networks support the probabilistic failure analysis of complex systems, e.g. dams and bridges, needed for a better understanding of the system reliability and for taking mitigation actions. Bayesian networks are useful in representing the interactions among system components graphically, while the quantitative strength of the interrelationships between the variables is measured using conditional probabilities. However, due to a lack of objective data it often becomes necessary to rely on expert judgment to provide subjective probabilities to quantify the model. This paper proposes an elicitation process that can be used to support the collection of valid and reliable data with the specific aim of quantifying a Bayesian Network, while minimizing the adverse impact of biases. To illustrate how this framework works, it is applied to a real-life case study regarding the safety of the Mountain Chute Dam and Generating Station, which is located on the Madawaska River in Ontario, Canada.

Eliciting Expert Judgements to Underpin Our Understanding of Faecal Indicator Organism Loss from Septic Tank Systems

“…The challenge for this elicitation process then becomes one of translating that wider expert understanding to the STS scenarios devised for this study. To aid this process, a clear definition of the QoI supported by scientific evidence is important to avoid ambiguity and potential misinterpretation of the elicitation results by the end users (Gosling, 2018;Verzobio et al, 2021). While other studies in conservation biology have involved experts in structuring the identified QoI to determine what was most manageable (Fitzgerald et al, 2021), in this study, the experts were presented with pre-defined scenarios that they discussed and revised accordingly.…”

Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: can the value of information be negative?

“…Clearly these quantities can change according to the age and cultural background of the individual. In principle, understanding the risk appetite can be done with an elicitation process (Verzobio, et al, 2020). In the following, indices (M) and (O) will indicate that a quantity is intended respectively from Malcolm the manager's perspective and Ophelia the owner's perspective.…”