2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2915597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ${\ell}_{0}$ -Norm Minimization for Energy-Efficient Timetabling in Subway Systems

Abstract: In this paper, a sparse optimization model with 0-norm and the squared 2-norm as the objective function is proposed for energy-efficient timetabling in subway systems by means of improving the regenerative braking energy utilization. Optimality analysis is addressed for the proposed sparse optimization problem. Specifically, the local minimizer is shown to be a KKT point without any additional constraint qualification. Moreover, based on the hard-thresholding operator, we yield an explicit formula for the Lagr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decomposition rule of the subdifferential remains to be proved as stated in the first equality in (15). Exploiting [Corollary 10.9] 40 combined with true^0=0$$ \hat{\partial}{\left\Vert \mathcal{E}\right\Vert}_0=\partial {\left\Vert \mathcal{E}\right\Vert}_0 $$ and true^δnormalΩfalse(false)=δnormalΩfalse(false)$$ \hat{\partial}{\delta}_{\Omega}\left(\mathscr{H}\right)=\partial {\delta}_{\Omega}\left(\mathscr{H}\right) $$, we get the inclusion ^g0()𝒪β0boldOboldOboldOboldO+δΩ(). By imitating the proof of expression (23) in Reference 48 (Theorem 1), the required conclusion is obtained by ^g0()𝒪β0boldOboldOboldOboldO+δΩ(). This completes the proof.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition rule of the subdifferential remains to be proved as stated in the first equality in (15). Exploiting [Corollary 10.9] 40 combined with true^0=0$$ \hat{\partial}{\left\Vert \mathcal{E}\right\Vert}_0=\partial {\left\Vert \mathcal{E}\right\Vert}_0 $$ and true^δnormalΩfalse(false)=δnormalΩfalse(false)$$ \hat{\partial}{\delta}_{\Omega}\left(\mathscr{H}\right)=\partial {\delta}_{\Omega}\left(\mathscr{H}\right) $$, we get the inclusion ^g0()𝒪β0boldOboldOboldOboldO+δΩ(). By imitating the proof of expression (23) in Reference 48 (Theorem 1), the required conclusion is obtained by ^g0()𝒪β0boldOboldOboldOboldO+δΩ(). This completes the proof.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the train timetable is an inexpensive option [20]. By adjusting the train timetable, the regenerative braking energy can be utilized by the accelerating trains in the same power arm [4,21]. However, the flexibility of the scheme is poor, and the energy-saving effect is not significant due to operational constraints and service requirements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%