1994
DOI: 10.1071/bt9940231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Embryological Study of Kava, Piper methysticum

Abstract: An embryological study of Piper methysticum Forster f. (Piperaceae), undertaken to identify the probable cause for the absence of fruits in cultivated varieties, has revealed that the majority of plants in all the cultivars examined bore only male flowers. The anthers are tetrasporangiate and the anther wall comprises a well-developed endothecium with fibrous thickenings, two middle layers and a glandular tapetum. Meiosis is normal and simultaneous cytokinesis leads to tetrahedral microspore tetrads. Pollen de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are now at least five female gametophytic variants known within Piperaceae: the 16‐nucleate Drusa‐type with a diploid central cell in Manekia (this study) or diploid and higher in Zippelia (Lei et al, 2002), the 16‐nucleate Penaea‐type with a tetraploid central cell in Manekia (this study), the Fritillaria‐type in Piper with a seven‐celled/eight‐nucleate female gametophyte with a tetraploid central cell (Maheshwari and Gangulee, 1942; Swamy, 1945; Yoshida, 1960; Kanta, 1962; Nikiticheva et al, 1981; Prakash et al, 1994), and two different functional variants of the 16‐nucleate Peperomia‐type in Peperomia generally with either eight‐ or 14‐nucleate central cells (Swamy, 1944; Nikiticheva et al, 1981; Plyushch, 1982; Smirnov and Grakhantseva, 1988; older studies reviewed in Maheshwari, 1937).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are now at least five female gametophytic variants known within Piperaceae: the 16‐nucleate Drusa‐type with a diploid central cell in Manekia (this study) or diploid and higher in Zippelia (Lei et al, 2002), the 16‐nucleate Penaea‐type with a tetraploid central cell in Manekia (this study), the Fritillaria‐type in Piper with a seven‐celled/eight‐nucleate female gametophyte with a tetraploid central cell (Maheshwari and Gangulee, 1942; Swamy, 1945; Yoshida, 1960; Kanta, 1962; Nikiticheva et al, 1981; Prakash et al, 1994), and two different functional variants of the 16‐nucleate Peperomia‐type in Peperomia generally with either eight‐ or 14‐nucleate central cells (Swamy, 1944; Nikiticheva et al, 1981; Plyushch, 1982; Smirnov and Grakhantseva, 1988; older studies reviewed in Maheshwari, 1937).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…All are tetrasporic, initiating female gametophyte ontogeny from four free megaspores (the haploid products of meiosis), which then undergo two mitoses to ultimately produce 16 haploid chromosome sets (partitioned into either eight or 16 nuclei during development). In Piper , the Fritillaria type has been reported (eight‐nucleate with pentaploid endosperm) (Maheshwari and Gangulee, 1942; Swamy, 1945; Yoshida, 1960; Kanta, 1962, Nikiticheva, 1981, Prakash et al, 1994); in Peperomia , the Peperomia type (16‐nucleate with 8‐15 ploid endosperm) (Campbell, 1901, 1902; Brown, 1908; Johnson, 1914; Swamy, 1944; Nikiticheva et al, 1981; Plyushch, 1982; Smirnov and Grakhantseva, 1988), and in Zippelia , the Drusa type (16‐nucleate with triploid or higher endosperm) (Lei et al, 2002). The status of Manekia and Verhuellia remain completely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apenas três espécies de Piper foram estudadas quanto à auto-incompatibilidade, P. methysticum se mostrou auto-incompatível (Prakash et al, 1994) e P. nigrum e P. arieianum são autocompatíveis (Martin & Gregory, 1962;Marquis, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…OLule 1 per gynoecium, small to medium (probably large in Zippelia), crassinucellar, bite<gmic, but unitegmic in Peperomia (see also Schmitz, 1872a,b;Johnson, 1902, 19 10.19 14;Fisher, 19 14;Hauser, 191 8;Abele, 1923;Fagerlind, 1939;Quibell, 194 1 ;hlaheshwari & Gangulee, 1942;Joshi, 1944;Martinoli, 1948;Maugini, 1950Maugini, , 1953Murty, 1959a,b;Yoshida, 1960;Kanta, 1963;Nikiticheva, 1981 a;Nikiticheva, Yakovlev & Plyusuch, 1981;Omori, 1982;Prakash & Kin, 1982;Tucker, 1982;Prakash, Brown & Wang, 1994), orthotropous, basal, erect. An aril is lacking.…”
Section: -1mentioning
confidence: 99%