2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICETECH) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icetech.2015.7275013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical analysis of decision tree algorithms: Modeling hepatitis data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensemble classifiers have been used in Neuroscience, proteomics and medical diagnosis. [13] proposed a modified random forest algorithm to calculate the accuracy of the classification algorithms on UCI liver dataset. It uses multi-layer perception classification algorithm and random subset feature selection method.…”
Section: Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensemble classifiers have been used in Neuroscience, proteomics and medical diagnosis. [13] proposed a modified random forest algorithm to calculate the accuracy of the classification algorithms on UCI liver dataset. It uses multi-layer perception classification algorithm and random subset feature selection method.…”
Section: Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using different classifier they concluded that Random forest takes less running time with the highest accuracy of 87.50%. This accuracy gives help in ailment prediction and classification in the field of medical science [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kaur et al [ 17 ] drew a comparative analysis of many attribute selection techniques and used evaluation metrics like kappa statistic, accuracy, positive rate, and latency to analyze the performance. Ramasamy et al [ 18 ] applied decision tables, Hoeffding tree, logistic model tree (LMT), ensemble classifiers, and other trees to classify and compare risks of hepatitis. It was found that random forest recorded better performance than other algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%