An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Capital Acquisition and Bankruptcy Laws

Abstract

Ineffective capital acquisition decisions at start-up may lead to business failure and bankruptcy; a result which is both costly and disruptive to the owners and other stakeholders of the firm. To cope with the risk of failure, owners embark on a variety of risk-reducing activities whereas the U.S. government attempts to moderate the downside effects of such failures through the rules surrounding bankruptcy. Previous studies imply that as owners become more aware of the protections offered through the government regulation of bankruptcy, they should become less concerned with the effects of failure and be willing to raise higher levels of initial capital. Raising higher levels of initial capital, in turn, leads owners to take actions intended to reduce firm risk and to minimize the threat to their personal financial security. Data from a sample of small firms confirm our hypothesis by showing that as the level of initial capital acquisition increases, owners embark on activities intended to reduce firm risk. However, capital acquisition is not associated with the owner's familiarity with bankruptcy regulations. As a result, governmental objectives in establishing these regulations may not be achieved. Our findings have implications for firms' owners, consultants, and policymakers, in terms of the relationship between an entrepreneur's knowledge of bankruptcy laws and the financing of their enterprises.

Corporate Crisis and Sustainable Reorganization: Evidence from Bankrupt Austrian SMEs

“…Since bankruptcies are costly and disruptive for both entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, such as investors, employees, suppliers, and communities (Laitinen ; Van Auken, Kaufmann, and Herrmann ), we consider it prudent to analyze which factors and resources are essential for SMEs to overcome a crisis and to reorganize in a way that leads to a sustainable and lasting renewal. In particular, there is a need to investigate the changes SMEs must implement in order to bring about long‐term survival and entrepreneurial value creation in bankruptcy and their prerequisites.…”

A Three-Country Comparison of the Business Success versus Failure Prediction Model

“…Predicting entrepreneurial fate is an important area of research (Pompe and Bilderbeek 2005;Davidsson andKolsften, 2003 Westhead, Wright, andUcbasaran 2001) because bankruptcy is both costly and disruptive to a variety of firm stakeholder including owners, investors, and communities (Van Auken, Kaufmann, and Herrmann 2009). Success versus failure (S/F) prediction research benefits both the would-be and current entrepreneurs; those who assist, train, and advise them; those who provide capital for their ventures; their suppliers; researchers; and public policymakers (Dennis and Fernald 2001).…”

An Analysis of Funding Decisions for Niche Agricultural Products

“…Additionally, a higher percentage of requests were funded when the agency had rated business plans as a major constraint to funding proposals. Strong business plans and adequate collateral can reduce perceived risk on the venture (Van Auken et al, 2009).…”

“…1. Significant constraints are often associated with the lack of a good business plan and adequate collateral (Van Auken et al, 2009). Technical assistance, especially from providers of capital, can provide the producers with needed information to understand the process and requirement of capital acquisition (Korsching and Jacobs, 2005).…”