2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0922-1425(00)00063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical analysis on the stability of Japan’s aggregate import demand function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…'national cash flow' 1 rather than GDP or GNP (in real terms) and to include a time trend to define the longrun behaviour of imports. As consistent with Hamori and Matsubayashi (2001), the study (Tang, 2003a) has concluded that there is no stable (no cointegration) import demand function in Japan during the period analysed and stimulation of domestic business conditions in Japan will not necessarily link to the quantity of imports. Tang (2003c), however, has found a cointegrating relation among the Japanese aggregate imports, the components of real income (final consumption expenditure, domestic investment and exports) and relative price of imports during the period 1973-1997 (yearly data) via the bounds test (Pesaran et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'national cash flow' 1 rather than GDP or GNP (in real terms) and to include a time trend to define the longrun behaviour of imports. As consistent with Hamori and Matsubayashi (2001), the study (Tang, 2003a) has concluded that there is no stable (no cointegration) import demand function in Japan during the period analysed and stimulation of domestic business conditions in Japan will not necessarily link to the quantity of imports. Tang (2003c), however, has found a cointegrating relation among the Japanese aggregate imports, the components of real income (final consumption expenditure, domestic investment and exports) and relative price of imports during the period 1973-1997 (yearly data) via the bounds test (Pesaran et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Among the selected studies are Mah (1994), Bahmani-Oskooee and Niroomand (1998), Masih and Masih (2000), Hamori and Matsubayashi (2001), Tang (2003aTang ( , 2003b. A brief review of these studies can be found in Tang (2003aTang ( , 2003b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although equation built above could explain some portion of import demand, undertaken examination for most of countries, Faini et al (1988) found import demand function unstable. Import demand function was predicted by Shabbir and Mahmood (1991) for Pakistan, Carone (1996) for USA, Gregory and Hansen (1996) and Hamori and Matsubayashi (2001) for Japan, Dutta and Nasuriddin (1999) for Bangladesh, Tang and Nair (2002) for Malaysia, Tang (2002) for Indonesia, Chang et al (2005) for South Korea. They analyzed import demand by using conventional variables such as income and relative prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it eliminates the problem of multicollinearity which occurs when domestic and import prices are correlated. As such, this model is prevalent in many studies (Chang, Ho and Huang, 2005;Hamori and Matsubayashi, 2001;Anderton, 1999;Ioannidis and Schreyer, 1997). …”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%