2007
DOI: 10.2495/sdp-v2-n1-57-74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical application of probabilistic cost–benefit analysis: three case studies on dams in Malaysia, Nepal and Turkey

Abstract: This paper empirically applies cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to much debated hydropower projects in Malaysia, Nepal and Turkey. The study selects an interesting mixture of cases, as the main characteristics of each dam, the geographical locations of each dam, and the development stage of each country differ. The study brings together all the major issues attached to each hydropower project and estimates the quantitative impacts of these controversial dams. The CBA model in this study takes into account the prema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The project specific variables are FI (impacts on downstream fishery) for Bakun; IF (infrastructure cost) for Sharada-Babai; and LT (tourism loss) and AS (archaeological loss) for Ilisu. A brief summary of the equations used in the model, and all the parameters in the model and their values are listed in Morimoto and Hope [9]. Dixon et al [10] argue that the appropriate time horizon should be long enough to encompass the useful life of the proposed project, therefore the project life of 100 years is selected in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project specific variables are FI (impacts on downstream fishery) for Bakun; IF (infrastructure cost) for Sharada-Babai; and LT (tourism loss) and AS (archaeological loss) for Ilisu. A brief summary of the equations used in the model, and all the parameters in the model and their values are listed in Morimoto and Hope [9]. Dixon et al [10] argue that the appropriate time horizon should be long enough to encompass the useful life of the proposed project, therefore the project life of 100 years is selected in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%