2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9849-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Assessment of Variable Water Content and Grain-Size on X-Ray Fluorescence Core-Scanning Measurements of Deep Sea Sediments

Abstract: Deciphering the signal within X-ray fluorescence (XRF) core scanner data can be complex in comparison to conventional laboratory XRF analysis where samples are milled and pelleted or beaded. One complicating factor is that the down-core variability in water content and grain-size can affect element count rates thereby potentially leading to inaccurate interpretations. Experiences using an Itrax XRF core scanner data highlight some of the pitfalls that can occur when the sediment is inhomogeneous. We show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fan system advanced into a poorly oxygenated basin so the event beds are unbioturbated and hence retain their original depositional character. Helium porosity measurements on Ross Formation core plugs are low ( ca 0.5%; Pierce et al ., ) as a result of early cementation and moderate compaction, implying that there are no issues with variable porosity and interstitial fluids that complicate XRF scanner interpretation of soft‐sediment cores (MacLachlan et al ., ; Flood et al ., ).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fan system advanced into a poorly oxygenated basin so the event beds are unbioturbated and hence retain their original depositional character. Helium porosity measurements on Ross Formation core plugs are low ( ca 0.5%; Pierce et al ., ) as a result of early cementation and moderate compaction, implying that there are no issues with variable porosity and interstitial fluids that complicate XRF scanner interpretation of soft‐sediment cores (MacLachlan et al ., ; Flood et al ., ).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si and K, and also Ti, is absorbed by water within the sediment, reducing element intensities in the XRF spectrum (Tjallingii et al, 2007;Wilhelms-Dick et al, 2012;MacLachlan et al, 2015). The reduction in the intensity of the fluorescence from these elements as a result of absorption by interstitial water is dependent on sediment water content (Kido et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Factors Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compositions are only taken from beneath the oxidation fronts in these deposits, as elements are preferentially mobilised above these fronts, altering the compositions (Wilson et al 1986;Jarvis & Higgs, 1987). Attempts thus far to convert XRF core scanner outputs to elemental concentrations have been moderately successful (Weltje and Tjallingii, 2008;Hunt et al, 2015aHunt et al, , 2015bMacLachlan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Itrax µXrf Compositions Of Turbidite Mudcapsmentioning
confidence: 99%