2016 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/nfv-sdn.2016.7919486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical case for container-driven fine-grained VNF resource flexing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Orchestrator provides deployment of VNFs using hypervisor technology over bare-metal servers. Alternatively, container-based approach such as Docker could be adequate once it employs better CPU and memory consumption by considering traditional virtualised environments (Sheoran et al, 2016). However, owing the network performance metrics traditional hypervisor technology such as full-fledged guest operating system bring better network throughput which is a primary requirement to NaaS approach then container-based approach (Kozhirbayev and Sinnott, 2017).…”
Section: Figure 5 % Cpu Consumption Overtimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Orchestrator provides deployment of VNFs using hypervisor technology over bare-metal servers. Alternatively, container-based approach such as Docker could be adequate once it employs better CPU and memory consumption by considering traditional virtualised environments (Sheoran et al, 2016). However, owing the network performance metrics traditional hypervisor technology such as full-fledged guest operating system bring better network throughput which is a primary requirement to NaaS approach then container-based approach (Kozhirbayev and Sinnott, 2017).…”
Section: Figure 5 % Cpu Consumption Overtimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this architecture mainly suffers from flexible auto scaling in terms of handling monolithic MME implementation and complex state management. In [8], the authors proposed container-driven fine-grained resource flexing. They benchmarked the performance of the MME, Suricata, and Snort VNFs on bare metal, containers, and VMs under varying workloads.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current trend is to decompose a complete VNF in the form of micro-services [2], [10], [3], [11], [12] interacting between each other, each micro-service executing a set of elementary tasks. Once a VNF is decomposed into micro-services, the subsequent task is to instantiate them onto a virtualized architecture.…”
Section: A Decomposition Of a Vnf Into Micro-servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%