2013
DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-9-71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical comparison of knowledge and skill in the context of traditional ecological knowledge

Abstract: BackgroundWe test whether traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) about how to make an item predicts a person’s skill at making it among the Tsimane’ (Bolivia). The rationale for this research is that the failure to distinguish between knowledge and skill might account for some of the conflicting results about the relationships between TEK, human health, and economic development.MethodsWe test the association between a commonly-used measure of individual knowledge (cultural consensus analysis) about how to make… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the few studies that empirically examine the relationship between these two knowledge forms, results have been mixed. Knightley et al (2013) examined the relationship between the types of wood and feathers used for arrow shafts and fletching and the peer evaluations of arrow quality made by Tsimane participants. They also examined the relationship between plants used for dyes and peer evaluations of bags produced by the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the few studies that empirically examine the relationship between these two knowledge forms, results have been mixed. Knightley et al (2013) examined the relationship between the types of wood and feathers used for arrow shafts and fletching and the peer evaluations of arrow quality made by Tsimane participants. They also examined the relationship between plants used for dyes and peer evaluations of bags produced by the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few studies empirically examining the relationship between these two knowledge forms, results have been mixed. Knightley et al (2013) examined the relationship between the types of wood and feathers used for arrow shafts and fletching, and peer evaluations of arrow quality made by Tsimane participants. They also examined the relationship between plants used for dyes, and peer evaluations of participant produced bags.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used ‘agreement with experts’ techniques to verify response accuracy and to more objectively assign knowledge scores (Davis & Wagner 2003, Reyes-García et al 2006, Kightley et al 2016). Only two participants correctly identified all nine specimens, so participants scoring ≥3.5 for plant ID averaged across all nine orchid taxa were treated as experts (14 in total).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%