2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1462666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
389
1
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
389
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, this approach places fewer restrictions on data distribution and normality. Fourth, PLS-PM is generally more favorable for more complex models, such as ours, which uses 42 items (Hair et al 2012;Reinartz et al 2009). …”
Section: Analyses and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Third, this approach places fewer restrictions on data distribution and normality. Fourth, PLS-PM is generally more favorable for more complex models, such as ours, which uses 42 items (Hair et al 2012;Reinartz et al 2009). …”
Section: Analyses and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…compared to the large number of indicators per construct makes PLS-SEM a good choice as compared to the more traditional covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) (Reinartz, Haenlein, & Henseler, 2009), with the large number of indicators and complexity of the model actually helping to lessen the effects of PLS-SEM bias (Lohmoller, 1989;Reinartz et al, 2009;Ringle, Gotz, Wetzels, & Wilson, 2009). …”
Section: Preliminary Data Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for causal relationships in the proposed research model, the partial least squares approach (PLS) was used. This method is suitable for testing complex causal models with small sample size and has less stringent assumptions about normality of data than other methods [65][66][67][68] . PLS analysis involves two stages: (i) the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the measurement model; and (ii) the evaluation of the goodness of fit of the structural model 66 .…”
Section: Statistical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%