2020
DOI: 10.16993/sjwop.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Evaluation of the Relationship Between Human Relations Climate and Readiness for Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their review, Rhoades and Eisenberger suggest that supervisor support has been used interchangeably with organisational support and is generally taken to mean attempts to reduce aversive psychological reactions to stressors by providing material aid and emotional support. Myklebust et al (2020) add a further element by proposing that people define organisational support as the organisation being positively or negatively oriented towards employees in helping them (or not) to cope with the demands of the job. In the criminological and police studies literature, earlier work emphasises the link between organisational factors, stress, commitment, job satisfaction and performance (Davey et al, 2001; Shane 2010; Nalla et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their review, Rhoades and Eisenberger suggest that supervisor support has been used interchangeably with organisational support and is generally taken to mean attempts to reduce aversive psychological reactions to stressors by providing material aid and emotional support. Myklebust et al (2020) add a further element by proposing that people define organisational support as the organisation being positively or negatively oriented towards employees in helping them (or not) to cope with the demands of the job. In the criminological and police studies literature, earlier work emphasises the link between organisational factors, stress, commitment, job satisfaction and performance (Davey et al, 2001; Shane 2010; Nalla et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that readiness for change must be monitored and facilitated throughout the transformation process. As the current study shows, emphasizing the principles of human relations and organizational support can help build employee change readiness (Myklebust et al, 2020).…”
Section: Readiness For Changementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Overall, the human relations climate helps in developing positive work relationships and a balance of professionalism among colleagues (Kuenzi, 2008). The human relations model is often referred to as clan culture, where organizations are committed to the employees and facilitate open communication and employee involvement (Myklebust et al., 2020) Overall, the literature guides that the human relations climate improves morale and motivation among employees and encourages employees to share novel ideas, values and practices in organizations (Kirrane et al., 2017; Myklebust et al., 2020; Soumyaja et al., 2018). It has thus been identified as one of the crucial drivers of readiness to change in organizations.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with perceived organizational support, the human relations climate is another crucial factor that focuses on creating a conducive social atmosphere where employees are encouraged to participate in decision‐making (Myklebust et al., 2020). Moreover, the human relations climate facilitates the development of employee‐centered culture and leads to a range of individual outcomes for employees such as job satisfaction and high commitment (Cafferkey et al., 2019; Van Esch et al., 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%