2006
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2006.11435122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical examination of the Ohlson (1995) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used the same methodological approach as those of Bugeja and Gallery (2006) and Bepari and Mollik (2017) by using the Ohlson model to test the value relevance of goodwill and its aged components. This methodological approach has also been used before in South Africa by Eloff and De Villiers (2015), Swartz and Negash (2006), as well as De Klerk and De Villiers (2012). The model is also validated for use in a South African setting by (Swartz and Negash 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used the same methodological approach as those of Bugeja and Gallery (2006) and Bepari and Mollik (2017) by using the Ohlson model to test the value relevance of goodwill and its aged components. This methodological approach has also been used before in South Africa by Eloff and De Villiers (2015), Swartz and Negash (2006), as well as De Klerk and De Villiers (2012). The model is also validated for use in a South African setting by (Swartz and Negash 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodological approach has also been used before in South Africa by Eloff and De Villiers (2015), Swartz and Negash (2006), as well as De Klerk and De Villiers (2012). The model is also validated for use in a South African setting by (Swartz and Negash 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent empirical studies which use the Ohlson (1995) model, for example, Garrod and Rees (1998), Louder et al, (1996), Woldegabir (2004) and Swartz (2005), conclude that, although the model provides a useful foundation for value relevance research, additional work is required to fully specify the additional information variable. This is evidenced by the low coefficients of determination, which range from 0.15 to 0.46.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model does however include an 'other information' variable that is difficult to specify. Most recent empirical studies which use the Ohlson (1995) model, for example, Garrod and Rees (1998), Amir (1993), Louder, Khurana and Boatsman (1996 and Swartz (2005), use dividends as a surrogate for the 'other' information variable. However, these studies conclude that additional work is required to specify this variable fully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Για την αποτίμηση του κινδύνου χρησιμοποιούνται συχνά διάφορα μεγέθη μέτρησης του κινδύνου σε συνδυασμό με τα θεμελιώδη μεγέθη των τραπεζών όπως αποτυπώνονται στις λογιστικές καταστάσεις (βλέπε μεταξύ άλλων: Beaver, Kettler, & Scholes, 1970, Brimble & Hodgson, 2007, Chun & Ramasamy, 1989, Elyasiani & Mansur, 2005, Mansur, Zangeneh, & Zitz, 1993, Salkeld, 2011. Αν και οι ερευνητές έχουν αναλύσει διεξοδικά την επίδραση των ΔΠΧΠ στην αξία της επιχείρησης (value-relevance) (Barth, Landsman, & Lang, 2008, Iatridis, 2008, Karamanou & Nishiotis, 2009, Iatridis & Rouvolis, 2010, Morais & Curto, 2009, Swartz & Negash, 2006) η επίδραση τους στον κίνδυνο (risk-relevance) δεν έχει λάβει τη δέουσα προσοχή. Συνεπώς υπό διερεύνηση είναι το ερώτημα κατά πόσο τα ΔΠΧΠ έχουν οδηγήσει στην αύξηση ή μείωση των κινδύνων στους οποίους εκτίθενται οι τράπεζες συμβάλλοντας έτσι στην μεταβολή της σταθερότητας του χρηματοπιστωτικού συστήματος και της αποτελεσματικότητας της νομισματικής πολιτικής.…”
Section: αιτιολόγηση ερευνητικού θέματοςunclassified