2014
DOI: 10.1186/2050-2974-2-s1-o60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical examination of the mislabelling of fat as an emotion in sub-clinical eating disorder groups

Abstract: Zhang et al.: An empirical examination of the mislabelling of fat as an emotion in sub-clinical eating disorder groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One likely reason is the clinical consensus that reports of feeling fat are misdescriptions: “[F]eeling fat is a result of mislabeling certain emotions and bodily experiences … These typically are negative mood states (e.g., feeling bored or depressed) or physical sensations that heighten body awareness (e.g., feeling full, bloated or sweaty)” (Ibid.). According to clinicians, when their clients report feeling fat, they are misdescribing entirely distinct bodily experiences or emotions (McFarlane et al, 2011; Mehak & Racine, 2020; Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: False Belief and Proprioceptive Misperceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One likely reason is the clinical consensus that reports of feeling fat are misdescriptions: “[F]eeling fat is a result of mislabeling certain emotions and bodily experiences … These typically are negative mood states (e.g., feeling bored or depressed) or physical sensations that heighten body awareness (e.g., feeling full, bloated or sweaty)” (Ibid.). According to clinicians, when their clients report feeling fat, they are misdescribing entirely distinct bodily experiences or emotions (McFarlane et al, 2011; Mehak & Racine, 2020; Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: False Belief and Proprioceptive Misperceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%