2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85914-5_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Examination of the Consistency Ratio in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this coefficient is less than or equal to 0.1, the agreement in the judgments is accepted; otherwise, the judgments must be reconsidered 55 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this coefficient is less than or equal to 0.1, the agreement in the judgments is accepted; otherwise, the judgments must be reconsidered 55 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this coefficient is less than or equal to 0.1, the agreement in the judgments is accepted; otherwise, the judgments must be reconsidered. 55 Using the judgments of a single manager to form the matrix of pairwise comparisons, which is the basis for decision-making when applying AHP to organizational issues, cannot result in a highly accurate decision matrix. Consequently, group cooperation and thought are logical and comprehensive methods for an organization's decision-making system.…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study the overall value of the consistency ratio is 0.1, this happens because of differences in the assessment on the basis of interests from the different stakeholders. With the consistency ratio value above 0.1, other studies suggest that the AHP method should be optimized to reduce the consistency ratio (Moussaoui et al, 2018;Lukinskiy et al, 2021).…”
Section: Table 7priority Towards Repairing Environmental Damagementioning
confidence: 99%