2008
DOI: 10.3813/aaa.918070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Investigation of Bow-Force Limits in the Schelleng Diagram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by Schoonderwaldt et al, 15 there was a higher degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the lower bow-force limit, which was shown to be strongly influenced by finger damping. As this was an uncertain factor in the current experiment, the location of the lower bow-force limit could not be exactly estimated.…”
Section: A Sustained Notesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out by Schoonderwaldt et al, 15 there was a higher degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the lower bow-force limit, which was shown to be strongly influenced by finger damping. As this was an uncertain factor in the current experiment, the location of the lower bow-force limit could not be exactly estimated.…”
Section: A Sustained Notesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The lower bow-force limit is therefore indicated by a band, representing the range of lower limits found under different conditions reported in that study. 15 Another assumption based on the earlier findings is that the lower limit is independent of bow velocity, in contrast to Schelleng's predictions. This behavior is extrapolated to bow velocities of 25 and 30 cm/s, not measured in the earlier study.…”
Section: A Sustained Notesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The acquisition of musical gestures and particularly of instrumental controls from a musical performance is a field of increasing interest with applications in acoustics (Schoonderwaldt et al, 2008), music pedagogy (Visentin et al, 2008), automatic music generation (Erkut et al, 2000;Maestre et al, 2010;Pérez-Carrillo et al, 2012), augmented performances (Bevilacqua et al, 2011; Proc. of the 11th International Symposium on CMMR, Plymouth, UK, June 16-19, 2015 Wanderley andDepalle, 2004) or performance transcription (Zhang and Wang, 2009) among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%