2016
DOI: 10.4018/jdm.2016070103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Investigation of the Perceived Benefits of Agile Methodologies Using an Innovation-Theoretical model

Abstract: There is little doubt that agile software development (ASD) methods have gained widespread acceptance in industry. Despite the attention these methods have received, there is little empirical affirmation of the benefits that accrue to those who use agile methodologies. Grounded in the conceptual foundations of innovation diffusion and agile philosophy of development, the authors' study validates a model to assess the perceived advantage of an iterative approach to software development. Consistent with their pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who perform better have higher perception levels, while others who own low scores do not result in the best outcomes (Langford and Reeves, 1998). Regarding agile behavior, Bonner et al (2010) found that the output is advantageous. Beliefs also have a lot more to do with the perception of performance and gaining an advantage (Stirin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Perceived Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who perform better have higher perception levels, while others who own low scores do not result in the best outcomes (Langford and Reeves, 1998). Regarding agile behavior, Bonner et al (2010) found that the output is advantageous. Beliefs also have a lot more to do with the perception of performance and gaining an advantage (Stirin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Perceived Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-defined processes and more documentation are involved in traditional approaches whereas in agile less documentation and more customer interaction is involved. Other than that Agile assumes more simplicity, embrace change, enable and focus on the next effort, maximize value, incrementally change, rapid feedback to all the stakeholders, quality deliverable and create documentation based on value (Bonner et al, 2016).…”
Section: Comparison Of Agile With Traditional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the agile methodology are based on four pillars [4]: (i) individuals and interactions over processes and tools; (ii) working software over comprehensive documentation; (iii) customer collaboration over contract negotiation; and (iv) responding to change over following a plan. Agile methods were designed to use a minimum of documentation, helping in the flexibility and responsiveness to change, that is, in this methodology, flexibility and adaptability are much more important than planning, unlike the traditional methodology [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%