2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0338-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical investigation of the effects of firm characteristics on the propensity to adopt cloud computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study, like previous research, finds that three IT skills continue to be in the top five rankings regardless of whether or not firm size is a consideration:  spreadsheets (Dillon & Kruck, 2008;Chen et al, 2009;Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012;Kearns, 2014;Lee et al, 2018)  Word Processing (Chen et al, 2009;Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012)  Internet research (Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012). This research's results also support previous findings that firm size is not a factor for Cloud Computing (Gupta et al, 2013;Seethamraju, 2015;Loukis et al, 2017). Note that Table 2 does not include Cloud Computing, and Cloud Computing ranks seventh and ninth, respectively, for SF and MLF respondents (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This study, like previous research, finds that three IT skills continue to be in the top five rankings regardless of whether or not firm size is a consideration:  spreadsheets (Dillon & Kruck, 2008;Chen et al, 2009;Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012;Kearns, 2014;Lee et al, 2018)  Word Processing (Chen et al, 2009;Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012)  Internet research (Welch et al, 2010;Cory & Pruske, 2012). This research's results also support previous findings that firm size is not a factor for Cloud Computing (Gupta et al, 2013;Seethamraju, 2015;Loukis et al, 2017). Note that Table 2 does not include Cloud Computing, and Cloud Computing ranks seventh and ninth, respectively, for SF and MLF respondents (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Though extensive empirical research has been conducted concerning the factors that affect the adoption of CC by firms (e.g. see [19]), quite limited empirical research has been conducted concerning the factors affecting the benefit firms obtain from the use of CC services, and in general the business value from CC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though there is extensive empirical research on the factors affecting the adoption of CC (e.g. see [19]), quite limited is the empirical research that has been conducted on the factors affecting the benefits from CC. This research is quite necessary, because CC is a new paradigm of sourcing the ICT services required by firms for supporting their processes and activities, based on external providers, which is quite different from the previous 'on-premises' paradigm, based on internal ICT services provision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their vast and positive impacts, several ICTs are defined not only as innovations but also as general purpose technologies (computers, internet, for instance) (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 2003;Basu and Fernald, 2007;Cardona, Kretschmer and Strobel, 2013), although complementary applications integrating the internal processes of the firms with the commercial system (such as einvoicing and e-commerce) are more vaguely conceptualised in literature. E-commerce applications, for instance, are commonly defined theoretically either as independent innovations (Bertschek and Fryges, 2002;Zhu et al, 2003;Zhu and Kraemer, 2005;Battisti and Stoneman, 2005;Hollenstein and Woerter, 2008), as a cluster of innovations or applications related to the internet (Wilson et al, 2008;Colombo et al, 2013) or as advanced computer networks over internet (Forman et al, 2012;Colombo et al, 2013;Gallego et al, 2014;Falk and Hagsten, 2015;Loukis et al, 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%