2017
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2017-249
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical method for absolute calibration of coccolith thickness

Abstract: Abstract. As major calcifiers in the open ocean, coccolithophores play a key role in the marine carbon cycle. Because they may be sensitive to changing CO 2 and ocean acidification, there is significant interest in quantifying past and present 10 variations in their cellular calcification by quantifying the thickness of the coccoliths or calcite plates that cover their cells.Polarized light microscopy has emerged as a key tool for quantifying the thickness of these calcite plates, but the reproducibility and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the present study appears to contradict, for example, [8], who reported that E. huxleyi coccolith mass was driven by variation in E. huxleyi morphotype relative abundance. The reason for this contradiction lies in part in the applied method of [8], which has been shown to have significant flaws detailed in [61,[82][83][84][85][86]. In addition, [8] measured only coccolith mass at a family level (Gephyrocapsa oceanica plus E. huxleyi) without analyzing the coccolith mass of individual E. huxleyi morphotypes.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the present study appears to contradict, for example, [8], who reported that E. huxleyi coccolith mass was driven by variation in E. huxleyi morphotype relative abundance. The reason for this contradiction lies in part in the applied method of [8], which has been shown to have significant flaws detailed in [61,[82][83][84][85][86]. In addition, [8] measured only coccolith mass at a family level (Gephyrocapsa oceanica plus E. huxleyi) without analyzing the coccolith mass of individual E. huxleyi morphotypes.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of this approach are that: (i) it directly measures complete coccoliths with no assumptions regarding their shape or thickness and (ii) it allows for quantification of calcite losses associated with missing parts or etching of the coccoliths. Disadvantages of this technique are the errors associated with the coccolith-calcite calibration and their consequent effect on the coccolith mass estimates (Fuertes et al, 2014;González Lemos et al, 2018). The morphometric approach, on the other hand, allows better taxonomic identification of the coccoliths and has smaller errors in the length measurements (~0.1 to 0.2 μm; Poulton et al 2011).…”
Section: Determination Of Coccolith Mass and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 200 coccolith and 10 fields of view were counted for the coccolith abundance and accumulation rate analyses. The coccolith mass was estimated on the circular polarized microscope with the gray-level method following the method 50,51 , in which the intensity of light was calibrated via a well measured calcite wedge. About 40 pictures were taken from the same slider made for coccolith counting.…”
Section: Coccolith Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%