2006
DOI: 10.18061/1811/24011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Empirical Method for Comparing Pitch Patterns in Spoken and Musical Melodies: A Comment on J.G.S. Pearl's "Eavesdropping with a Master: Leos Janáček and the Music of Speech."

Abstract: Music and speech both feature structured melodic patterns, yet these patterns are rarely compared using empirical methods. One reason for this has been a lack of tools which allow quantitative comparisons of spoken and musical pitch sequences. Recently, a new model of speech intonation perception has been proposed based on principles of pitch perception in speech. The "prosogram" model converts a sentence's fundamental frequency contour into a sequence of discrete tones and glides. This sequence is meant to re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties have received little empirical attention in previous research because it is typically assumed that an overarching melody that comes remotely near a genuine musical melody is not to be found in language (Zatorre & Baum, 2012). To be sure, the notion of melody has previously been discussed as potentially providing a link between how speech and music, respectively, structure sound events in time (Chow & Brown, 2018; Lerdahl, 2001; Patel, 2006, 2010; Patel et al, 2006), specifically, regarding intonation and tone contours (Glaser, 2000; Hausen et al, 2013; Nespor & Vogel, 1986; Palmer & Hutchins, 2006). There is also evidence for prosodic (particularly pitch-based) transfer from music to speech (Schön et al, 2004; Thompson et al, 2004) and from speech to music (Brown et al, 2009; Deutsch et al, 2006; Schellenberg, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties have received little empirical attention in previous research because it is typically assumed that an overarching melody that comes remotely near a genuine musical melody is not to be found in language (Zatorre & Baum, 2012). To be sure, the notion of melody has previously been discussed as potentially providing a link between how speech and music, respectively, structure sound events in time (Chow & Brown, 2018; Lerdahl, 2001; Patel, 2006, 2010; Patel et al, 2006), specifically, regarding intonation and tone contours (Glaser, 2000; Hausen et al, 2013; Nespor & Vogel, 1986; Palmer & Hutchins, 2006). There is also evidence for prosodic (particularly pitch-based) transfer from music to speech (Schön et al, 2004; Thompson et al, 2004) and from speech to music (Brown et al, 2009; Deutsch et al, 2006; Schellenberg, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates a pitch contour stylisation from Prosogram. Prosogram is a suitable tool for studying music and language (Patel, Iversen, & Rosenberg, 2006;Patel, 2006) since the representation produced consists on level pitches and pitch glides. Hence, we have applied this method for speech and singing.…”
Section: Discrimination System Model 221 Automatic Segmentation Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Such approach treats musical sounds as verbal phonemes, and is characteristic to indigenous music of Siberia, North America and Australia, as well as vocalizations of children in early childhood. • Speech can be heard as a collection of pitches, based on the reduction of the entire spectral content to its periodic component as manifested in vowels-the comparative analysis of the TO of which requires the generation of "prosograms" (Patel, 2006). The methodology of their creation has been developed by Mertens (Mertens, 2004).…”
Section: Filtrator Analysis Of Verbal Ear Versus Comparator Analysis ...mentioning
confidence: 99%